A Large-Scale Multi-Center Independent Validation Study of A Panel of Seven Biomarkers for the Detection of Ovarian Cancer.
Z. Zhang,R. C. Bast,I. Vergote,C. Hogdall,F. R. Ueland,A. Van der Zee,Z. Wang,C. Yip,D. W. Chan,E. T. Fung
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.5057
IF: 45.3
2006-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:5057 Background: Previously we discovered seven serum biomarkers: ITIH4, transthyretin, ApoA1, CTAPIII, hepcidin, transferrin, and SAA, for the detection of ovarian cancer. They are fragments, cleavages, or PTMs of circulating proteins that are difficult to measure by conventional immunoassays. Using optimzed mass spectrometry assays, we evaluated these biomarkers in a large-scale multi-center study. Methods: A total of 607 serum samples from five sites were analyzed using SELDI TOF-MS protocols optimized for the seven biomarkers. They included 234 women with benign gynecologic diseases, and 373 patients with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (101 early stage, 231 late stage, and 40 stage unknown). Among them, 165 benigns and 228 cancers had a CA125 available at time of analysis. The median and quartiles of CA125 for benign, early stage, and late or unknown stage were 26/11/57 IU, 80/22/434 IU, and 234/40/1114 IU, respectively. The biomarkers were assessed individually using the Mann-Whitney U Test. A linear composite index was derived in an unsupervised fashion using data from one site and then calculated for the remaining data using the fixed formula. ROC curve analyses were performed on data from individual sites and all sites combined. Results: All seven biomarkers individually demonstrated statistically significant differentiating power, and the majority had p-value<0.00001. AUCs of the composite index in ROC analyses for the six sites were 0.602, 0.566, 0.821, 0.813, and 0.592 in detecting cancer at all stages from benign. On the combined data, the differences in AUC between the index and CA125 were not statistically significant for the detection of cancer at all stages (AUC=0.706 vs. 0.725) or early stages only (AUC=0.534 vs. 0.653). However, the index did better at the high-sensitivity range. At a fixed sensitivity of 86%, the specificity of the index was 34% (77/226) compared to CA125 at 26% (42/163). For early stage cases, at a fixed sensitivity of 84%, the specificity of the index was 24% (55/226) compared to CA125 at 14%% (22/163). Conclusions: We validated seven previously discovered biomarkers, individually and in combination. Prospective studies and assay development are under way to further characterize their clinical utility. [Table: see text]