Using Corpora in Contrastive and Translation Studies Intermodal Corpora in Contrastive and Translation Studies Contrastive Phraseology: Method and Analysis Food for Thought: Metaphor, Machines and Translation Contrastive Linguistics as a Discovery Procedure beyond Translation Properties: the Contrib
Silvia Bernardini,S. O. Ebeling,Dorothy Kenny,Béatrice Lamiroy,Ku Leuven,E. König,V. Gast,English-German Contrasts Understanding,E. Berlin,Verlag Schmidt,W. Van Belle,B. V. Langendonck,Van Goethem,S. Neumann,References Alves
Abstract:Book Plenary presentations 4 Intermodal corpora, i.e., corpora featuring parallel or comparable bilingual texts produced under different translation modalities (typically oral and written), constitute a relatively new but very promising source of data, not just for translation, but for contrastive studies as well. In this talk I first survey the sources of data commonly used in corpus-based contrastive and translation studies, and argue that intermodal corpora afford a novel perspective that can enrich both fields. I then briefly describe EPTIC, the European Parliament Translation and Interpreting Corpus, which builds on the well-known EPIC (European Parliament Interpreting Corpus), and makes available independently produced translational and interpretational outputs based on input from the European Parliament plenary sessions, as well as the input source texts/discourses themselves. The corpus, still under construction, is thus intermodal and bidirectional (English <=> Italian). To illustrate the potential of this type of corpus, I present data on the use of collocations in interpreted and translated English. The comparison highlights quantitative and qualitative similarities and differences whose implications are discussed both in a contrastive and translational perspective. I conclude by arguing that EPTIC could and should be enlarged through an exercise of collaborative corpus construction, and make some suggestions as to how we, as a research community, could proceed.. In this talk I will outline a method applied in the analysis of patterns in contrast (Ebeling & Ebeling 2013), where patterns are defined as recurrent word-combinations with semantic unity. The contrastive approach is inspired by scholars who advocate translations and cross-linguistic correspondences as tertium comparationis (e. concept of perceived similarity. Bidirectional translation data play an important role in this respect. The focus on patterns (phraseology) is inspired by the observation that meaning, to a greater extent than is often believed, is said to reside in multi-word units rather than single words. These units, or patterns, and Sinclair's (1996, 1998) extended-unit-of-meaning model are therefore central to the approach. To illustrate the method, a short case study will be presented. The study shows that patterns weave an intricate web of meanings across languages and demonstrates the need for more phraseology-oriented contrastive studies. This paper explores how the rise of contemporary machine translation stands to change how we understand translation itself. Drawing on corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy, as well as existing studies of metaphors of translation, it focuses in particular on how computer scientists construct translation in a one-million word …