Abstract:To assess a novel approach for automatic flow velocity computation in deriving quantitative flow ratio (QFR) from coronary angiography. QFR is a novel approach for assessment of functional significance of coronary artery stenosis without using pressure wire and induced hyperemia. Patient-specific coronary flow is estimated semi-automatically by frame count method, which is subjective and inconvenient in the workflow of QFR analysis. The vascular structures were automatically delineated from coronary angiogram. Subsequently, the centerline of the interrogated vessel was extracted from the delineated lumen on each image frame and the change in the length of centerline was used to compute the flow velocity, which provided patient-specific flow for computation of QFR (QFR auto ). A parameter derived from the increase in centerline length was used to automatically quantify the stability of contrast flow. From the two angiographic image runs used for three-dimensional angiographic reconstruction, the one with better stability was used to compute QFR auto . QFR auto was assessed in all patients enrolled in the FAVOR II China study, and compared with the commercialized QFR computational method based on frame count (QFR count ), using pressure wire-based fractional flow reserve (FFR) as the reference standard. Out of 328 vessels with paired FFR data, QFR auto was successfully computed on 325 (99%) vessels with acceptable stability in filling of contrast flow. The flow velocity computed by the proposed approach had a weak to moderate correlation with the frame count method (r = 0.37, p < 0.001), with mean differences of − 0.02 ± 0.07 m/s (p < 0.001). QFR auto had good correlation (r = 0.96, p < 0.001) and agreement (mean difference: − 0.01 ± 0.04, p < 0.001) with QFR count . Good correlation (r = 0.83, p < 0.001) and agreement (mean difference: 0.01 ± 0.06, p = 0.016) were also observed between QFR auto and FFR. Using FFR ≤ 0.80 to define functional significance of coronary stenosis, the overall diagnostic accuracy for QFR auto was 93.2% (95% CI 90.5–96.0%). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve did not differ significantly between QFR count and QFR auto (difference: 0.00; 95% CI − 0.01 to 0.01; p = 0.529). Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio for QFR auto were 92.4% (95% CI 86.0–96.5%), 93.7% (95% CI 89.5–96.6%), 14.7 (95% CI 8.7–25.0), and 0.1 (95% CI 0.0–0.2), respectively. Automatic computation of patient-specific coronary flow velocity based on coronary angiography is feasible. Assessment of QFR based on this novel approach had good diagnostic accuracy in determining the functional significance of coronary stenosis.

Enhancing Flow Mediated Dilation Analysis by Optimizing an Open-Source Software with Automated Edge Detection

Flow-mediated dilation analysis coupled with nitric oxide transport to enhance the assessment of endothelial function

A Comprehensive Review of Clinical Studies Applying Flow-Mediated Dilation

Normalization Of Flow Mediated Dilation To Time-to-Peak Improves Measurement Sensitivity: 1634

Semiautomated Software to Improve Stability and Reduce Operator-Induced Variation in Vascular Ultrasound Speckle Tracking

Improvement in Accuracy of Ultrasonic Measurement of Transient Change in Viscoelasticity of Radial Arterial Wall Due to Flow-Mediated Dilation by Adaptive Low-Pass Filtering

Identifying the Role of Flow-Mediated Dilatation Assessment in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Review

Normalization of Flow-Mediated Dilation to Shear Stress Area under the Curve Eliminates the Impact of Variable Hyperemic Stimulus

Adjusting Flow-Mediated Dilation for Shear Stress Stimulus Allows Demonstration of Endothelial Dysfunction in a Population with Moderate Cardiovascular Risk.

Diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility of optical flow ratio for functional evaluation of coronary stenosis in a prospective series

Stability and reproducibility of brachial artery flow-mediated dilation

Impact of volunteer-related and methodology-related factors on the reproducibility of brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilation: analysis of 672 individual repeated measurements

Diagnostic Accuracy of Optical Flow Ratio: an Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis

Flow-Mediated Dilatation: Learning Curve Study with a Novice Operator

A Novel Method of Noninvasive Quantification of Fractional Flow Reserve Based on Computational Fluid Dynamics

Flowmotion Monitored by Flow Mediated Skin Fluorescence (FMSF): A Tool for Characterization of Microcirculatory Status

The influence of post-processing software on quantitative results in 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance examinations

Diagnostic Accuracy of Intracoronary Optical Coherence Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve for Assessment of Coronary Stenosis Severity.

Assessment of Minimum Stent Area and Stent Expansion and Its Relation to Ultrasonic Flow Ratio Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights from MULTIVESSEL TALENT Trial

Non-Invasive Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction Using Vascular Deformation-Based Flow Estimation

Automatic coronary blood flow computation: validation in quantitative flow ratio from coronary angiography