[Chance finding of a bilateral central pulmonary embolism while using cardiac computed tomography for the clarification of a coronary anomaly]

D Ropers,W G Daniel,H-P Hobbach,T Walter,P Schuster
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-973610
2007-04-05
Abstract:History: A 42 year-old man reported transient breathlessness and chest pain on the first day after a four-hour flight. During the following five months the symptoms recurred four times. After another episode he went to an outpatient department for further assessment. Investigations: Blood tests demonstrated slightly elevated LDH (343 U/l) and also a minor increase of the D-dimers (710 microg/l). Hypercholesterolemia was also found (LDL-cholesterol 180 mg/dl). The rest of the blood tests, including the cardiac enzymes, were within normal limits. The electrocardiogram (ECG) showed sinus rhythm, heart rate 85 bpm and pre-terminal T-negativity in the precordial leads V1 to V3. Resting echocardiography and chest X-ray showed no significant abnormalities. The exercise ECG demonstrated no further ECG changes. However, because of the symptoms and a cardiovascular risk profile (family history, hypercholesterolemia and smoking) a coronary angiography was performed, which excluded coronary artery disease but revealed a so-called "right-sided single coronary artery", the left and right coronary arteries originating with a common stem from the right sinus of valsalva. To define the exact course of the left main coronary artery (whether in front of the pulmonary artery, between the two great arteries, retroaortic or septal) a contrast-enhanced cardiac computed tomography (CT) was performed, which demonstrated an anomalous position of the left main coronary artery in front of the pulmonary artery. Bilateral pulmonary embolism was an additional and unexpected finding. Treatment and course: Oral anticoagulation was initiated after a coagulopathy had been excluded. The ultrasonography of the leg did not demonstrate any thrombosis. There was no evidence of malignant disease. Conclusion: Mild symptoms and absence of right heart congestion do not exclude pulmonary embolism. Depending on the symptoms and history, pulmonary thrombembolism has to be considered, especially if cardiac or extra-cardiac causes have been eliminated. The diagnostic method of choice for the detection or exclusion of pulmonary embolism is contrast-enhanced multi-slice spiral CT.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?