Abstract:Environmental impact assessments of marine aggregate extraction are traditionally conducted based on morphological characteristics of macrobenthos, which is time-consuming, labour-intensive and requires specific taxonomic expert knowledge. Bulk DNA metabarcoding is suggested as a promising alternative. This study compares the traditional morphological and the bulk DNA metabarcoding method to assess the impact of sand extraction activities on three sandbanks in the Belgian North Sea. Substantial differences in the detected species were observed between methods: Abundant and/or large macrobenthos species were detected by both methods, while small species or species with an exoskeleton were usually only detected by the morphological method. Taxa uniquely detected by bulk DNA metabarcoding could be explained by specimens identified at a higher taxonomic level by morphology, or by specimens with very low read numbers, probably representing species missed in the morphological sorting process, DNA traces on the specimens or false positives during PCR amplification efficiency. Despite the difference in detected species, comparable alpha and beta diversity patterns were observed by both methods, indicating that bulk DNA metabarcoding can effectively detect the overall ecological changes associated with sand extraction. We further demonstrate that bulk DNA metabarcoding reduces sample processing both in time (44 % faster) and cost (26 % cheaper) compared to the morphology-based identification. However, biomass quantification remains challenging for bulk DNA metabarcoding since of the ten most abundant genera, only two genera (Echinocardium and Ophelia) showed a significant positive correlation between biomass and read numbers. Additionally, bulk DNA metabarcoding does not provide information on life stages or size of the identified specimens. As such, our results underpin the complementary nature of both methods, wherein DNA-based analyses allow for rapid detection of community changes (as similar patterns in alpha and beta diversity and biotic index were observed), while morphology-based analyses provide additional information on e.g. secondary production (biomass) and size composition. We show how the strengths of both methods can be combined to assess the impact of sand extraction.

Assessing Environmental Quality in a Historically Polluted Fjord: A Comparison of Benthic Foraminiferal eDNA and Morphospecies Approaches

Assessment of the ecological quality status of the Sepetiba Bay (SE Brazil): When metabarcoding meets morphology on foraminifera

High-throughput sequencing and morphology perform equally well for benthic monitoring of marine ecosystems

Comparing methods and indices for biodiversity and status assessment in a hydropower-regulated river

Assessing the Ecological Status of European Rivers and Lakes Using Benthic Invertebrate Communities: A Practical Catalogue of Metrics and Methods

Assessing the Ecological Quality Status in tropical Indian estuaries: testing the applicability of benthic foraminiferal indices

Environmental DNA metabarcoding for benthic monitoring: A review of sediment sampling and DNA extraction methods

Taxonomic accuracy and complementarity between bulk and eDNA metabarcoding provides an alternative to morphology for biological assessment of freshwater macroinvertebrates

Monitoring the ecological status of rivers with diatom eDNA metabarcoding: A comparison of taxonomic markers and analytical approaches for the inference of a molecular diatom index

Application of benthic foraminiferal indices to infer the ecological quality status in the Sepetiba Bay (SE Brazil)

Ecological quality assessement of marinas: An integrative approach combining biological and environmental data

Harnessing eDNA metabarcoding to investigate fish community composition and its seasonal changes in the Oslo fjord

Towards eDNA informed biodiversity studies – Comparing water derived molecular taxa with traditional survey methods

Decoding the Baltic Sea’s Past and Present: A simple Molecular Index for Ecosystem Assessment

Enhanced Prediction of Seafloor Ecological State Using 16S Nanopore Sequencing

Using Fish as a Sentinel in Risk Management of Contaminated Sediments

The Core of the Matter—Importance of Identification Method and Biological Replication for Benthic Marine Monitoring

Edna Metabarcoding in Zooplankton Improves the Ecological Status Assessment of Aquatic Ecosystems

High-resolution fisheries data reveal effects of bivalve dredging on benthic communities in stressed coastal systems

From DNA to diagnostics: A case study using macroinvertebrate metabarcoding to assess the effectiveness of restoration measures in a Dutch stream

Comparative study of traditional and DNA-based methods for environmental impact assessment: A case study of marine aggregate extraction in the North Sea