Evaluation of the test–retest and inter-mode comparability of the Impact of Vision Impairment questionnaire in people with chronic eye diseases

Jan Henrik Terheyden,Reglind A. D. Ost,Charlotte Behning,Liza Mekschrat,Gamze Bildik,Maximilian W. M. Wintergerst,Frank G. Holz,Robert P. Finger
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-023-06334-4
2024-01-06
Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
Abstract:The main objective of this study is to assess the test–retest and inter-administration mode reliability of the Impact of Vision Impairment profile (IVI), a common patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for people with chronic eye diseases.
ophthalmology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main purpose of this paper is to evaluate the test-retest reliability and comparability of different administration modes of the Impact of Vision Impairment (IVI) questionnaire in patients with chronic eye diseases. Specifically: 1. **Test-retest reliability**: The study assessed the consistency of the IVI questionnaire when measured multiple times in the same group of patients. 2. **Comparability of different administration modes**: The study compared the consistency of IVI questionnaire scores across telephone, paper, and electronic administration modes. The study results indicate that the IVI questionnaire has very high test-retest reliability and comparability across different administration modes, supporting its use as a reliable patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) to assess vision-related quality of life. Additionally, the findings support the use of multiple administration modes in clinical trials and real-world evidence generation to enhance implementation flexibility and reliability.