Abstract:Overconfidence behavior, one form of positive illusion, has drawn considerable attention throughout history because it is viewed as the main reason for many crises. Investors' overconfidence, which can be observed as overtrading following positive returns, may lead to inefficiencies in stock markets. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the presence of investor overconfidence by employing an artificial intelligence technique and a nonlinear approach to impulse responses to analyze the impact of different return regimes on the overconfidence attitude. We examine whether investors in an emerging stock market (Borsa Istanbul) exhibit overconfidence behavior using a feed-forward, neural network, nonlinear Granger causality test and nonlinear impulse-response functions based on local projections. These are the first applications in the relevant literature due to the novelty of these models in forecasting high-dimensional, multivariate time series. The results obtained from distinguishing between the different market regimes to analyze the responses of trading volume to return shocks contradict those in the literature, which is the key contribution of the study. The empirical findings imply that overconfidence behavior exhibits asymmetries in different return regimes and is persistent during the 20-day forecasting horizon. Overconfidence is more persistent in the low- than in the high-return regime. In the negative interest-rate period, a high-return regime induces overconfidence behavior, whereas in the positive interest-rate period, a low-return regime induces overconfidence behavior. Based on the empirical findings, investors should be aware that portfolio gains may result in losses depending on aggressive and excessive trading strategies, particularly in low-return regimes.

The Impact of Overconfidence Bias and Disposition Effect on the Volume of Transaction and the Volatility of the French Stock Market

Confidence and the stock market: an agent-based approach

Overconfidence, financial literacy and excessive trading

Optimization of the impact measurement of market structure on liquidity and volatility

EFFECTS OF BEHAVIORAL FINANCE ON SOUTHEAST ASIAN STOCK MARKETS

The volume-implied volatility relation in financial markets: A behavioral explanation

Investor Overconfidence and Idiosyncratic Volatility of Stock Returns

An Empirical Study on the Overconfidence of Investors under the Overall Perspective

On the relationship between trading volume and stock price volatility in CASE

Which return regime induces overconfidence behavior? Artificial intelligence and a nonlinear approach

The Impact of Trading Behavioral Biases on Market Liquidity under Different Volatility Levels: Evidence from the Chinese Commodity Futures Market

The Dynamic Relationship Among Return, Volatility And Trading Volume In China Stock Market -An Empirical Study Based On Quantile Regression

Dissecting cross-impact on stock markets: an empirical analysis

Investor Overconfidence and the Increase in Idiosyncratic Risk

Animal Spirits: Stock Market Volatility and Risk Aversion

Impact is not just volatility

The impacts of investor sentiment on different economic sectors: Evidence from Istanbul Stock Exchange

Investor sentiment and stock return volatility: Evidence from the Johannesburg Stock Exchange

The Impact of Trade Characteristics on Stock Return Volatility: Evidence from the Australian Stock Exchange*

When Vegas Comes to Wall Street: Associations Between Stock Price Volatility and Trading Frequency Amongst Gamblers