Abstract:In this paper we present a novel methodology for identifying scholars with a Twitter account. By combining bibliometric data from Web of Science and Twitter users identified by <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://Altmetric.com" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> we have obtained the largest set of individual scholars matched with Twitter users made so far. Our methodology consists of a combination of matching algorithms, considering different linguistic elements of both author names and Twitter names; followed by a rule-based scoring system that weights the common occurrence of several elements related with the names, individual elements and activities of both Twitter users and scholars matched. Our results indicate that about 2% of the overall population of scholars in the Web of Science is active on Twitter. By domain we find a strong presence of researchers from the Social Sciences and the Humanities. Natural Sciences is the domain with the lowest level of scholars on Twitter. Researchers on Twitter also tend to be younger than those that are not on Twitter. As this is a bibliometric-based approach, it is important to highlight the reliance of the method on the number of publications produced and tweeted by the scholars, thus the share of scholars on Twitter ranges between 1% and 5% depending on their level of productivity. Further research is suggested in order to improve and expand the methodology.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to systematically identify scholars who are active on Twitter. Specifically, the authors have developed a new methodology to match scholars with their Twitter accounts by combining bibliometric data from Web of Science (WoS) and Twitter account data recorded by Altmetric.com. This method aims to overcome the shortcomings of small sample sizes and high manual labor intensity in previous studies, and provide a more systematic and large - scale method to identify scholars' Twitter accounts. ### Main problems: 1. **How to identify scholars' Twitter accounts on a large scale**: The paper proposes a new method that combines bibliometric data and social media data to systematically identify scholars' Twitter accounts. 2. **The activity level of scholars on Twitter**: Through this method, researchers can analyze the activity of scholars in different disciplinary fields and with different academic output levels on Twitter. 3. **The characteristics of scholars on Twitter**: It explores the characteristics of scholars on Twitter, such as age distribution and disciplinary distribution, and the relationship between these characteristics and their performance in the academic community. ### Methodology: - **Data sources**: Use author data in the Web of Science database and Twitter account data in the Altmetric.com database. - **Matching algorithm**: Match by normalizing and cleaning data and combining different language elements (such as names, institutions, geographical locations, etc.). - **Scoring system**: Develop a rule - based scoring system to score the matching results to determine the most likely correct matching pairs. ### Results: - **Matching scale**: Through this method, more than 385,000 scholars' Twitter accounts have been successfully matched, which is the largest - scale matching of scholars' Twitter accounts so far. - **Disciplinary distribution**: Scholars in the social sciences and humanities are the most active on Twitter, while scholars in the natural sciences are the least active. - **Age distribution**: Scholars who are active on Twitter are generally younger than those who are not. ### Significance: - **Systematicness**: It provides a systematic method to identify scholars' Twitter accounts in large - scale datasets. - **Verifiability**: It has been verified by external standards (such as data provided by ORCID), which improves the reliability of the method. - **Expandability**: Once scholars' Twitter accounts are identified, other bibliometric data, such as institutions, research fields, citation impacts, etc., can be further linked to more comprehensively analyze scholars' online activities. By solving these problems, this research provides a new perspective for understanding scholars' behavior on social media and lays the foundation for future related research.

Scholars on Twitter: who and how many are they?

Large-scale identification and characterization of scholars on Twitter

An open dataset of scholars on Twitter

Implications of Twitter in Health-Related Research: A Landscape Analysis of the Scientific Literature

A systematic identification and analysis of scientists on Twitter

Scholars in an increasingly open and digital world: How do education professors and students use Twitter?

Scholarly Twitter metrics

Understanding the Twitter Usage of Humanities and Social Sciences Academic Journals

User engagement with scholarly tweets of scientific papers: a large-scale and cross-disciplinary analysis

Beyond citations: Scholars' visibility on the social Web

The counting house: measuring those who count. Presence of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, Informetrics, Webometrics and Altmetrics in the Google Scholar Citations, ResearcherID, ResearchGate, Mendeley & Twitter

Astrophysicists on Twitter: An in-depth analysis of tweeting and scientific publication behavior

What do computer scientists tweet? Analyzing the link-sharing practice on Twitter

Tracking the Digital Footprints to Scholarly Articles from Social Media

Tweeting biomedicine: an analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature

Who shares scholarly output on Facebook? A systematic investigation into their location, productivity and identities

Twitter Predicts Citation Rates of Ecological Research

Can We Count on Social Media Metrics? First Insights into the Active Scholarly Use of Social Media

Who Are Tweeting About Academic Publications? A Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Altmetric Studies

The Botization of Science? Large-scale study of the presence and impact of Twitter bots in science dissemination

Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature