Abstract:This update, along with a copy of the original proposal (attached as Appendix B), is a jeopardy resubmission of experiment E02-108 approved by PAC22. This is the only Jefferson Lab polarized 3He experiment which is seeking to better understand the 3He system, as opposed to using it as an effective neutron target, by measuring double-polarized asymmetries in the 3 He( e, e ′d) reaction which are believed to be a probe particularly sensitive to the details of the 3He system. Since the original proposal, major theoretical advances have been made in the Faddeev calculations of the Bochum/Krakow and Hannover groups, resulting in quite distinct descriptions of these observables. This development has important implications for all “neutron” experiments and has rendered the physics case of the experiment even more pertinent. The recent first successful operation of the BigBite spectrometer at an angle, beam energy, and luminosity very similar to the present proposal has demonstrated that the instrumental requirements of our experiment can be met. We continue to ask for 15 PAC days. 1 Update of the physics case A variety of He-based experiments seeking to extract neutron information (such as GE and GM, or A n 1 at high x) rely on a virtually perfect theoretical knowledge of the groundstate spin structure of He. The manifestations of S ′and D-state components, specifically the degrees of neutron and proton polarizations within the polarized He nucleus, represent a most important part of this knowledge. Yet, we maintain that the structure of polarized He has not been studied comprehensively enough to accept the extractions performed in these experiments with unreserved confidence. A direct measurement devoted to a better understanding of the He system itself is needed, contrary to the multitude of experiments seeking to extract neutron information based on this (incomplete) input. Without a significant improvement in this understanding, future experiments on He and those being analyzed will be seriously impaired. A measurement of a set of double-polarization observables with enough kinematical lever arm is needed in order to constrain the theories. Quantifying the role of the S′ and D states in He is one of the key facets of these theories, and thus of the “standard model” of few-body systems. The proponents of the state-of-the-art Faddeev calculations have repeatedly asked for such tests to be done, and the list of References published in the past few years testifies to the intense work invested in the field.

Comment on "Test of the Brink-Axel Hypothesis for the Pygmy Dipole Resonance" [Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 182503 (2017)]

Comprehensive Test of the Brink-Axel Hypothesis in the Energy Region of the Pygmy Dipole Resonance

Is the generalized Brink-Axel hypothesis valid?

Validity of the generalized Brink-Axel hypothesis in $^{238}$Np

What went wrong with: "The Interaction of Neutrons With 7Be: "Lack of Standard Nuclear Physics Solution to the "Primordial 7Li Problem"", by M. Gai [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1812.09914v1" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.09914v1">arXiv:1812.09914v1</a>]?

Comment on: "The interaction of neutrons with 7Be at BBN temperatures: Lack of Standard Nuclear Solution to the Primordial 7Li Problem" by M. Gai et al

Nuclear deformation and neutron excess as competing effects for pygmy dipole strength

Pygmy Dipole Resonance Built on the Shape-Isomeric State in Ni-68

Search for Pauli Exclusion Principle Violations with Gator at LNGS

Comments on the publication "Discrete symmetries tested at 10e-4 precision using linear polarization of photons from positronium annihilations" by P. Moskal et al

Comments on the "Reply to 'Comment on "Piezonuclear decay of thorium" [Phys. Lett. A 373 (2009) 1956]' [Phys. Lett. A (2009, in press]" [Phys. Lett. A (2009), in press] by F. Cardone et. al

Comment on "15O(alpha,gamma)19Ne Breakout Reaction and Impact on X-Ray Bursts"

Violation of a Leggett-Garg Inequality Using Ideal Negative Measurements in Neutron Interferometry

JLab PAC 28 ( Jeopardy resubmission of E 02-108 ) June 27 , 2005 Measurement of A x and A z asymmetries in the quasi-elastic

Comment on "Motional Averaging of Nuclear Resonance in a Field Gradient"

Measurement of Ax and Az asymmetries in the quasi-elastic

New Limit on the D Coefficient in Polarized Neutron Decay

Response to Comment on "Pairing and Phase Separation in a Polarized Fermi Gas"

Impact of Lorentz violation on anomalous magnetic moments of charged leptons

Observation of the X17 anomaly in the decay of the Giant Dipole Resonance of $^8$Be