Abstract:Face recognition is not rooted in a universal eye movement information-gathering strategy. Western observers favor a local facial feature sampling strategy, whereas Eastern observers prefer sampling face information from a global, central fixation strategy. Yet, the precise qualitative (the diagnostic) and quantitative (the amount) information underlying these cultural perceptual biases in face recognition remains undetermined. To this end, we monitored the eye movements of Western and Eastern observers during a face recognition task, with a novel gaze-contingent technique: the Expanding Spotlight. We used 2 Gaussian apertures centered on the observers' fixations expanding dynamically at a rate of 1 degrees every 25 ms at each fixation the longer the fixation duration, the larger the aperture size. Identity-specific face information was only displayed within the Gaussian aperture; outside the aperture, an average face template was displayed to facilitate saccade planning. Thus, the Expanding Spotlight simultaneously maps out the facial information span at each fixation location. Data obtained with the Expanding Spotlight technique confirmed that Westerners extract more information from the eye region, whereas Easterners extract more information from the nose region. Interestingly, this quantitative difference was paired with a qualitative disparity. Retinal filters based on spatial-frequency decomposition built from the fixations maps revealed that Westerners used local high-spatial-frequency information sampling, covering all the features critical for effective face recognition (the eyes and the mouth). In contrast, Easterners achieved a similar result by using global low-spatial-frequency information from those facial features. Our data show that the face system flexibly engages into local or global eye movement strategies across cultures, by relying on distinct facial information span and culturally tuned spatially filtered information. Overall, our findings challenge the view of a unique putative process for face recognition.

Maps of Visual Importance

Investigating Cultural Diversity for Extrafoveal Information Use in Visual Scenes.

Mapping Face Recognition Information Use across Cultures.

Waldo Reveals Cultural Differences in Return Fixations

Event-based Encoding of Biological Motion and Location in Visual Working Memory.

Object-based Encoding in Visual Working Memory: Evidence from Memory-driven Attentional Capture

Integrated Encoding of Relations and Objects in Visual Working Memory.

The Object As the Unit of Interaction Between Visual Working Memory and Visual Attention

Do we actively inhibit recently attended but no longer relevant information

Object-based Encoding in Visual Working Memory: A Critical Revisit.

Attentional Mechanism for Organization in Visual Working Memory

Salient Locations Search Based on Human Visual Attention: an Experimental Analysis

A consensus-based elastic matching algorithm for mapping recall fixations onto encoding fixations in the looking-at-nothing paradigm

Selective Visual Attention Revealed by Integrating FMRI and Eye-Tracking

Influence of initial fixation position in scene viewing

The nature of the visual representations involved in eye movements when walking down the street

Predicting eye fixations with higher-level visual features.

An awareness-dependent mapping of saliency in the human visual system

BubbleView: an interface for crowdsourcing image importance maps and tracking visual attention

Influence of low-level stimulus features, task dependent factors, and spatial biases on overt visual attention

Refixation behavior in naturalistic viewing: Methods, mechanisms, and neural correlates