BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation with Diverse Function Calls and Complex Instructions
Terry Yue Zhuo,Minh Chien Vu,Jenny Chim,Han Hu,Wenhao Yu,Ratnadira Widyasari,Imam Nur Bani Yusuf,Haolan Zhan,Junda He,Indraneil Paul,Simon Brunner,Chen Gong,Thong Hoang,Armel Randy Zebaze,Xiaoheng Hong,Wen-Ding Li,Jean Kaddour,Ming Xu,Zhihan Zhang,Prateek Yadav,Naman Jain,Alex Gu,Zhoujun Cheng,Jiawei Liu,Qian Liu,Zijian Wang,David Lo,Binyuan Hui,Niklas Muennighoff,Daniel Fried,Xiaoning Du,Harm de Vries,Leandro Von Werra
2024-10-08
Abstract:Task automation has been greatly empowered by the recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) via Python code, where the tasks ranging from software engineering development to general-purpose reasoning. While current benchmarks have shown that LLMs can solve tasks using programs like human developers, the majority of their evaluations are limited to short and self-contained algorithmic tasks or standalone function calls. Solving challenging and practical requires the capability of utilizing diverse function calls as tools to efficiently implement functionalities like data analysis and web development. In addition, using multiple tools to solve a task needs compositional reasoning by accurately understanding complex instructions. Fulfilling both of these characteristics can pose a great challenge for <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://LLMs.To" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> assess how well LLMs can solve challenging and practical tasks via programs, we introduce BigCodeBench, a benchmark that challenges LLMs to invoke multiple function calls as tools from 139 libraries and 7 domains for 1,140 fine-grained tasks. To evaluate LLMs rigorously, each task encompasses 5.6 test cases with an average branch coverage of 99%. In addition, we propose a natural-language-oriented variant of BigCodeBench, BigCodeBench-Instruct, that automatically transforms the original docstrings into short instructions only with essential information. Our extensive evaluation of 60 LLMs shows that LLMs are not yet capable of following complex instructions to use function calls precisely, with scores up to 60%, significantly lower than the human performance of 97%. The results underscore the need for further advancements in this area.
Software Engineering,Artificial Intelligence,Computation and Language