Abstract:One of the most fundamental problems in genome rearrangement studies is the (genomic) distance problem. It is typically formulated as finding the minimum number of rearrangements under a model that are needed to transform one genome into the other. A powerful multi-chromosomal model is the Double Cut and Join (DCJ) model.While the DCJ model is not able to deal with some situations that occur in practice, like duplicated or lost regions, it was extended over time to handle these cases. First, it was extended to the DCJ-indel model, solving the issue of lost markers. Later ILP-solutions for so called natural genomes , in which each genomic region may occur an arbitrary number of times, were developed, enabling in theory to solve the distance problem for any pair of genomes. However, some theoretical and practical issues remained unsolved. On the theoretical side of things, there exist two disparate views of the DCJ-indel model, motivated in the same way, but with different conceptualizations that could not be reconciled so far. On the practical side, while ILP solutions for natural genomes typically perform well on telomere to telomere resolved genomes, they have been shown in recent years to quickly loose performance on genomes with a large number of contigs or linear chromosomes. This has been linked to a particular technique, namely capping . Simply put, capping circularizes linear chromosomes by concatenating them during solving time, increasing the solution space of the ILP superexponentially. Recently, we introduced a new conceptualization of the DCJ-indel model within the context of another rearrangement problem. In this manuscript, we will apply this new conceptualization to the distance problem. In doing this, we uncover the relation between the disparate conceptualizations of the DCJ-indel model. We are also able to derive an ILP solution to the distance problem that does not rely on capping. This solution significantly improves upon the performance of previous solutions on genomes with high numbers of contigs while still solving the problem exactly and being competitive in performance otherwise. We demonstrate the performance advantage on simulated genomes as well as showing its practical usefulness in an analysis of 11 Drosophila genomes.

Circular genome rearrangement models: applying representation theory to evolutionary distance calculations

Maximum likelihood estimates of pairwise rearrangement distances

An algebraic model for inversion and deletion in bacterial genome rearrangement

Exposing Phylogenetic Relationships by Genome Rearrangement

Rearrangement Problems with Duplicated Genomic Markers

Recombinations, chains and caps: resolving problems with the DCJ-indel model

Circular Networks from Distorted Metrics

Position and content paradigms in genome rearrangements: the wild and crazy world of permutations in genomics

Closing the complexity gap of the double distance problem

Investigating the complexity of the double distance problems

Models of Genome Evolution

Intra-strand symmetries and asymmetries in bacterial DNA: Evolutive features or relics of primordial genomes?

Relaxing the Hypotheses of Symmetry and Time-Reversibility in Genome Evolutionary Models

Algebraic double cut and join -- A group-theoretic approach to the operator on multichromosomal genomes

Rearrangement Distance Problems: An updated survey

A New Method for Modeling Coalescent Processes with Recombination

Complexity and Enumeration in Models of Genome Rearrangement

Modelling Breakage-Fusion-Bridge Cycles as a Stochastic Paper Folding Process

Synthetic genome rearrangement reveals dynamics of chromosome evolution shaped by hierarchical chromatin organization

Partition Based Algorithms for Rearrangement Distances with Flexible Intergenic Regions

Estimation of the True Evolutionary Distance under the Fragile Breakage Model