Abstract:Large observational databases are often subject to missing data. As such, methods for causal inference must simultaneously handle confounding and missingness; surprisingly little work has been done at this intersection. Motivated by this, we propose an efficient and robust estimator of the causal average treatment effect from cohort studies when confounders are missing at random. The approach is based on a novel factorization of the likelihood that, unlike alternative methods, facilitates flexible modelling of nuisance functions (e.g., with state‐of‐the‐art machine learning methods) while maintaining nominal convergence rates of the final estimators. Simulated data, derived from an electronic health record‐based study of the long‐term effects of bariatric surgery on weight outcomes, verify the robustness properties of the proposed estimators in finite samples. Our approach may serve as a theoretical benchmark against which ad hoc methods may be assessed. Résumé Les grandes bases de données observationnelles sont souvent confrontées au problème des données manquantes. De ce fait, les méthodes d'inférence causale doivent gérer à la fois les facteurs de confusion et les données manquantes, un domaine étonnamment peu exploré. Pour répondre à ce défi, les auteurs de cet article proposent un estimateur efficace et robuste de l'effet causal moyen du traitement. Cet estimateur est spécialement conçu pour les études de cohortes où les facteurs de confusion sont manquants de manière aléatoire. L'approche proposée s'appuie sur une nouvelle factorisation de la vraisemblance. Contrairement à d'autres méthodes, celle‐ci permet de modéliser les fonctions de nuisance de manière flexible, notamment grâce à des techniques avancées d'apprentissage automatique, et ce tout en maintenant les taux de convergence attendus des estimateurs finaux. Des simulations basées sur des dossiers médicaux électroniques concernant les effets à long terme de la chirurgie bariatrique sur le poids confirment la robustesse des estimateurs dans des échantillons finis. Cette approche pourrait servir de référence théorique pour évaluer d'autres méthodes ad‐hoc.

Causal inference taking into account unobserved confounding

Valid causal inference with unobserved confounding in high-dimensional settings

Causal Inference with Unmeasured Confounding from Nonignorable Missing Outcomes

Flexible sensitivity analysis for causal inference in observational studies subject to unmeasured confounding

A robust and efficient approach to causal inference based on sparse sufficient dimension reduction

Interval Estimation of Individual-Level Causal Effects under Unobserved Confounding

Distinguishing Between Mediators and Confounders is Important for the Causal Inference in Observational Studies

Causal Inference with High-dimensional Discrete Covariates

Nonparametric causal inference with confounders missing not at random

Causal bounds for outcome-dependent sampling in observational studies

Causal Inference for a Hidden Treatment

Identifying Causal-Effect Inference Failure with Uncertainty-Aware Models

Causal Inference under Interference and Model Uncertainty

Sparsity Double Robust Inference of Average Treatment Effects

Doubly Robust Inference in Causal Latent Factor Models

Causal inference targeting a concentration index for studies of health inequalities

Robust causal inference for point exposures with missing confounders

Causal Inference With Selectively Deconfounded Data

Causal Inference with Non-IID Data under Model Uncertainty

Causal inference under over-simplified longitudinal causal models

Contrasting Identifying Assumptions of Average Causal Effects: Robustness and Semiparametric Efficiency