Performance Comparison of Algorithms for Movie Rating Estimation

Alper Kose,Can Kanbak,Noyan Evirgen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1711.01647
2017-11-06
Abstract:In this paper, our goal is to compare performances of three different algorithms to predict the ratings that will be given to movies by potential users where we are given a user-movie rating matrix based on the past observations. To this end, we evaluate User-Based Collaborative Filtering, Iterative Matrix Factorization and Yehuda Koren's Integrated model using neighborhood and factorization where we use root mean square error (RMSE) as the performance evaluation metric. In short, we do not observe significant differences between performances, especially when the complexity increase is considered. We can conclude that Iterative Matrix Factorization performs fairly well despite its simplicity.
Information Retrieval,Machine Learning
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to compare the performance of different algorithms in predicting movie ratings. Specifically, the authors evaluated three different algorithms - User - Based Collaborative Filtering, Iterative Matrix Factorization, and Yehuda Koren's Integrated Model. These algorithms are used to predict potential users' ratings of movies, given a user - movie rating matrix based on past observations. In the study, the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) was used as a performance evaluation metric to assess the effectiveness of these algorithms. Through experiments, the authors aimed to find out which algorithm can provide better prediction performance as the complexity increases.