Abstract:Universal self-selectivity of a social choice function (SCF) F defined in Koray (Econometrica 68:981–995, 2000) implies that F is either dictatorial or anti-dictatorial. In an attempt to escape this impossibility, here we weaken self-selectivity of an SCF by introducing the notion of selection-closedness pertaining to families of SCFs. As in the self-selectivity setting, a society, which is to make a choice from a set A of alternatives, is also to choose the choice rule that will be employed in making that choice. Self-selectivity of an SCF F requires that F outrivals all available SCFs by selecting itself from among them if it is also used in choosing the choice rule, where the societal preferences on the available SCFs are induced from those on the set A of alternatives in a consequentialist way. Given a collection of SCFs and a nonempty finite set of available SCFs containing also members of an SCF in is now not required any more to select itself from but it suffices that it selects some member of for to be selection-closed. It is shown that a proper subset of the collection of all neutral SCFs is selection-closed if and only if all its members are either dictatorships or anti-dictatorships. We further weaken the notion of selection-closedness to an extent that not only enables us to escape the impossibility result, but also equips us with a yardstick to compare correspondences as to whether or not their singleton valued refinements form a weakly selection-closed family. A rich family of scoring correspondences with strict scoring vectors are shown to pass the test of weak selection-closedness, while the Pareto and Condorcet correspondences fail.

Selection closedness and scoring correspondences

Resolute refinements of social choice correspondences

Strategy-proof interval-social choice correspondences over extended single-peaked domains

Relaxed notions of Condorcet-consistency and efficiency for strategyproof social decision schemes

Incentives in Social Decision Schemes with Pairwise Comparison Preferences

Constrained School Choice with Incomplete Information

Balancedness of Social Choice Correspondences

Semi-Random Impossibilities of Condorcet Criterion

Characterizing the Top Cycle via Strategyproofness

Escaping Arrow's Theorem: The Advantage-Standard Model

Christian Klamler's "A distance measure for choice functions" [Social Choice and Welfare 30 (2008) 419–425]: a correction

Set-rationalizable choice and self-stability

A New Weak Choice Principle

Breaking ties in collective decision making

The Intentional Selection Assumption

Subset Selection Based On Multiple Rankings in the Presence of Bias: Effectiveness of Fairness Constraints for Multiwinner Voting Score Functions

Single-Crossing Differences in Convex Environments

A theory of best choice selection through objective arguments grounded in Linear Response Theory concepts

Nonseparable Sample Selection Models with Censored Selection Rules

Condorcet Consistency And Pairwise Justifiability Under Variable Agendas

Symmetric conformity functions make decision-making processes independent of the distribution of learning strategies