Abstract:BSV (Barberis, Huang and Vishny [1998]) model is one of the most important explanative models in the area of behavioral finance. The existing BSV model is a model of how behavioral investors form beliefs, which produces both overreaction and mean-reversion for a wide range of parameter values. However, BSV model does not address the market equilibrium problems, which is critical for the asset pricing theory. Thus the following 2 questions are meaningful for the existing BSV model to be extended to an equilibrium model in which there are both BSV investors and rational investors in a market of risky asset: Will BSV model maintain its explanative power if rational investors are introduced? Who will lose money to their counterparts in trading of risky assets, the behavioral investors or the rational investors? In this paper, we present an agent-based computational model of the dynamic game between BSV investors and rational investors. The results of our model answer the above two questions. First, the introduction of rational investors to the market of risky asset will not eliminate the anomalies of overreaction and mean-reversion. We believe that it is because the unpredictability of BSV agents' behavior adds the total risk of risky asset, which in turn prevents rational investors from taking unlimited position to arbitrage. At that time, the risky asset is mispriced. Second, we do not find any evidence that the behavioral investors will lose money to their counterparts although their cognitive bias causes them to form a false kind of expectation on the future price of the risky asset. On the contrary, some weak evidence on that behavioral investors are less likely to bankrupt is reported. We contribute it to that BSV investors will be overcautious when the market price is going down continuously due to their cognitive bias, and then decrease the probability of bankruptcy. While at that time, rational investors will try to correct the market price distorted by BSV in- vestors and thus take an additional arbitrage position, which may increase their returns, but will increase the probability of bankruptcy

Behavioral Finance -- Asset Prices Predictability, Equity Premium Puzzle, Volatility Puzzle: The Rational Finance Approach

A rational finance explanation of the stock predictability puzzle

Rational Finance Approach to Behavioral Option Pricing

Behavioral Finance Option Pricing Formulas Consistent with Rational Dynamic Asset Pricing

Decision Bias and Relative Rationality in Behavioral Fionance

An Empirical Review of Behavioral Decision Making in the Financial Markets

Behavioral portfolio theory and behavioral asset pricing model as an alternative to standard finance concepts

Asymmetric return rates and wealth distribution influenced by the introduction of technical analysis into a behavioral agent based model

Behavioral Finance: Investor Psychology and Market Outcomes

Psychology-based Models of Asset Prices and Trading Volume

The Application of Behavioral Finance: the Discussion about the Important Anomalies

Bsv Investors versus Rational Investors: an Agent-based Computational Finance Model

Behavioralizing Finance

A comprehensive review of behavioral biases in financial decision-making: from classical finance to behavioral finance perspectives

One trade at a time -- unraveling the Equity Premium Puzzle

Limited or Biased: Modeling Sub-Rational Human Investors in Financial Markets

Solving the Equity Risk Premium Puzzle and Inching Towards a Theory of Everything

Can Rational Investors Overreact?

Computational Experimental Finance, Technical Rules and Time Series Returns Predictability

Prospect Theory and Stock Market Anomalies

A Heterogeneous Agent-based Asset Pricing Model and Simulation