Abstract:Aims/Purpose: The aim of our study was to verify the presence of dry eye disease (DED) in diabetic patients. We also tried to determine the relationship between diabetic neuropathy and the presence of ocular surface disease. Methods: 52 type 2 diabetic patients and 52 non‐diabetic, sex and age‐matched controls were included in the study. All participants completed the OSDI questionnaire and undergone the eye surface examination with IDRA analyser including interferometry, tear meniscus height, non‐invasive tear break‐up time (NIBUT), evaluation of blepharitis, blinking pattern, pupillometry and meibography. Corneal sensation in the centre of the cornea and its 4 quadrants was analysed with the Cochet–Bonnet aesthesiometer (CBE). Corneal confocal microscopy images of sub‐basal plexus were evaluated using ACCMetrics. The concentrations of the neurotrophic factors: beta‐NGF, BDNF, NT‐4 as well as inflammatory mediators (TNF‐α, VEGF, IL‐2, ‐1β, ‐4, ‐5, ‐6, ‐8, ‐10, ‐12, GM‐CSF, IFN‐γ) were measured in the tear film using Luminex 200 analytic platform. Results: The OSDI was significantly higher in diabetic patients compared to the controls (mean: 29.08 vs. 11.67 points; p < 0.001). The groups did not differ in the results of the Schirmer test, interferometry, NIBUT and meibography values. Moreover, we did not find the elevation in the concentrations of the ocular surface inflammation indicators in tears of diabetics as compared to controls. There was a significant difference in tear meniscus between groups. Diabetics achieved significantly worse results than the control group in terms of corneal sensation, innervation parameters (average nerve length = 6.70 vs 11.54 mm/mm 2 ; p < 0.001, average density = 9.26 vs. 19.19/mm 2 ; p < 0.001), scotopic pupillometry and blinking interval. Tear film BDNF concentrations were lower in diabetic eyes as compared to controls (mean 1.85 vs. 2.29 pg/mg; p = <0.001). Conclusions: The lack of proinflammatory response in diabetic eyes and no differences between groups in the terms of objective clinical features may suggest that there is no cause‐and‐effect relationship between diabetes and DED. Corneal innervation disorders, clinically noticeable as decreased corneal sensation, result in a number of complications, that have a direct impact on the subjective feelings of the patient.

An attempt to evaluate the anterior surface homeostasis in patients with diabetic retinopathy