A RGUING FROM F ACTS TO D UTIES ( A ND C ONVERSELY )

Lorenzo Peña
Abstract:One of the most controversial issues about arguments involving deontic and ethical matters is whether statements of duty or right can be inferred from statements of fact, and conversely. Most analytical philosophers have inclined to give a negative answer, alleging that duties or rights are not implied by mere facts (or the other way round), and hence that no combination of facts can imply a duty or a right, and no combination of duties or rights implies a fact.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?