Cooperation in public goods games: stay, but not for too long

Lucas Wardil,Marco A. Amaral

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/g8030035

2017-07-31

Abstract:Cooperation in repeated public goods game is hardly achieved, unless contingent behavior is present. Surely, if mechanisms promoting positive assortment between cooperators are present, then cooperators may beat defectors, because cooperators would collect greater payoffs. In the context of evolutionary game theory, individuals that always cooperate cannot win the competition against defectors in well-mixed populations. Here, we study the evolution of a population where fitness is obtained in repeated public goods games and players have a fixed probability of playing the next round. As a result, the group size decreases during the game. The population is well-mixed and there are only two available strategies: always cooperate (ALLC) or always defect (ALLD). Through numerical calculation and analytical approximations we show that cooperation can emerge if the players stay playing the game, but not for too long. The essential mechanism is the interaction between the transition from strong to weak altruism, as the group size decreases, and the existence of an upper limit to the number of rounds representing limited time availability.

Physics and Society

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how cooperative behavior can emerge and persist in repeated public goods games. Specifically, the author studied the evolutionary dynamics between cooperative strategies and defection strategies in a well - mixed population when individuals continue to participate in the game with a fixed probability in each round of the game. Through numerical calculations and analytical approximation methods, the author shows that cooperation can emerge, but only if the participants need to stay in the game for a sufficient amount of time, but not too long. The key mechanism lies in the transition from strong altruism to weak altruism as the group size decreases, and there is an upper limit on the maximum number of rounds representing the limited time availability.

The core problem of the paper is to explore how, in repeated public goods games, controlling the probability \( w \) of players continuing the game affects the evolution of cooperative behavior. Research shows that if the players' stay time in the game is moderate, that is, \( w \) is neither too high nor too low, cooperative behavior is more likely to prevail over defection behavior. This is because a moderate stay time can reduce the group size to a certain extent, thus entering the weak altruism stage, at which time cooperative behavior has more advantages. However, if \( w \) is too high, resulting in players staying in the game for too long, the best opportunity for cooperation may be missed, which is instead not conducive to the evolution of cooperative behavior.

In summary, this paper aims to reveal how, in repeated public goods games, adjusting the probability of players continuing the game can promote the emergence and maintenance of cooperative behavior.