On Dynamical Systems Theory in Quantitative Psychology and Cognition Science: A Fair Discrimination Between Deterministic and Statistical Counterparts Is Required

Adam Gadomski,Marcel Ausloos,Tahlia Casey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.09399

2017-06-28

Abstract:The present communication addresses a set of observations, obeying both deterministic as well as statistical formal requirements, and serving to operate within the framework of the dynamical systems theory, with a certain emphasis placed on initial data. It is argued that statistical approaches can manifest themselves non unequivocally, leading to certain virtual discrepancies in psychological and/or cognitive data analyses, termed sometimes in literature as, questionable research practices. This communication points to the demand for a deep awareness of the data origins, which can indicate whether the exponential (Malthus type) or the algebraic (Pareto type) statistical distribution ought to be effectively considered in practical interpretation. This is also related to the question of how frequently patients behave in a specific way, and the significance of these behaviors in determining a patient's progression or regression, involving a certain memory effect. In this perspective, it is discussed how a sensitively applied hazardous or triggering factor can be helpful for well-controlled psychological strategic treatments, also those attributable to obsessive/compulsive disorders or even self-injurious behaviors, with their both criticality and complexity exploiting relations between a therapist and a patient.

Physics and Society,Medical Physics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper aims to explore how to reasonably distinguish between deterministic methods and statistical methods when applying Dynamical Systems Theory (DST) in quantitative psychology and cognitive science. Specifically, the paper emphasizes the importance of initial data and points out that statistical methods may show non - uniqueness in psychological and cognitive data analysis, leading to so - called "problematic research practices". The author discusses whether the exponential distribution (Malthus - type) or the power - law distribution (Pareto - type) should be considered in practical interpretations, which is related to the frequency of patient - specific behaviors and their importance to the patient's progress or regression, especially behaviors involving memory effects.

The paper further explores how to sensitively apply risk or trigger factors to assist in controlled psychological strategic treatment, especially when dealing with obsessive - compulsive disorder (OCD) or self - harming behaviors. The author believes that these treatment methods can utilize the complex relationship between therapists and patients to achieve therapeutic purposes by stimulating or suppressing certain behaviors.

In conclusion, the core issue of the paper is: How can we more accurately understand and analyze psychological and cognitive data, especially those involving memory effects, by distinguishing between deterministic and statistical methods within the framework of Dynamical Systems Theory? This will not only help to avoid biases in research but also provide more effective strategies for clinical treatment.