Abstract:This work tests if the large-scale galaxy distribution can be characterized as a fractal system. The $\Lambda$CDM cosmology with $H_0=(70\pm 5)$ km/s/Mpc is adopted to study the UltraVISTA DR1, COSMOS2015 and SPLASH surveys, alongside the number density equations of these galaxy distribution systems as fractals with dimension D. The relativistic distance definitions $d_L$, $d_Z$ and $d_G$ are used to estimate the galaxy number densities in the redshift interval $0.1 \leq z \leq 4$ at volume limited subsamples. Applying the appropriate relations for the description of galaxy fractal structures with single dimension $D$ in the relativistic settings to these surveys datasets it is possible to state that for $z<1$ the UltraVISTA DR1 galaxies presented an average of $D=(1.58\pm 0.20)$, the COSMOS2015 galaxies produced $D=(1.39\pm 0.19)$ and the SPLASH galaxies generated $D=(1.00\pm 0.12)$. For $1 \leq z \leq 4$ the dimensions respectively decreased to $D=(0.59\pm 0.28)$, $D=0.54^{+0.27}_{-0.26}$ and $D=0.83^{+0.36}_{-0.37}$. These results are robust under the Hubble constant uncertainty assumed here. Analysis of blue and red galaxies subsamples in the COSMOS2015 and SPLASH surveys show that the fractal dimensions of blue galaxies present essentially no alteration from the values above, although the ones for the red galaxies changed mostly to smaller values, meaning that D may be assumed as a more intrinsic property of the distribution of objects in the Universe, thus allowing for the fractal dimension to be used as a tool to study different populations of galaxies. All results confirm the decades old theoretical prediction of a decrease in the fractal dimension for $z>1$ suggesting that either there are yet unclear observational biases causing such decrease in the fractal dimension, or the galaxy clustering was possibly more sparse and the universe void dominated in a not too distant past.

Fractal dimension analysis for automatic morphological galaxy classification

Automated Galaxy Morphology: A Fourier Approach

Rotation invariant descriptors for galaxy morphological classification

Machine Learning and galaxy morphology: for what purpose?

Spiral-Elliptical automated galaxy morphology classification from telescope images

Machine and Deep Learning Applied to Galaxy Morphology -- A Comparative Study

New Image Statistics for Detecting Disturbed Galaxy Morphologies at High Redshift

Galaxy morphology - an unsupervised machine learning approach

Unveiling Galaxy Morphology through an Unsupervised-Supervised Hybrid Approach

Exploring the Morphologies of High Redshift Galaxies with Machine Learning

Galaxy Classification: A machine learning approach for classifying shapes using numerical data

Automating galaxy morphology classification using K nearest neighbors and non-parametric statistics

Fractals and the Distribution of Galaxies

MEGS: Morphological Evaluation of Galactic Structure

Soft clustering analysis of galaxy morphologies: A worked example with SDSS

Deep learning for studies of galaxy morphology

Galaxy Distribution Systems as Fractals

Galaxy Morphological Classification with Manifold Learning

USmorph: An Updated Framework of Automatic Classification of Galaxy Morphologies and Its Application to Galaxies in the COSMOS Field

A morphological study of galaxies in ZwCl0024+1652, a galaxy cluster at redshift z $\sim$ 0.4

Automatic quantitative morphological analysis of interacting galaxies