Developing diagnostic tools for low-burnup reactor samples

Patrick Jaffke,Benjamin Byerly,Jamie Doyle,Anna Hayes,Gerard Jungman,Steven Myers,Angela Olson,Donivan Porterfield,Lav Tandon
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.8.044025
2017-05-18
Abstract:We test common fluence diagnostics in the regime of very low burnup natural uranium reactor samples. The fluence diagnostics considered are the uranium isotopics ratios $^{235}$U/$^{238}$U and $^{236}$U/$^{235}$U, for which we find simple analytic formulas agree well with full reactor simulation predictions. Both ratios agree reasonably well with one another for fluences in the mid $10^{19}\,\mathrm{n/cm^2}$ range. However, below about $10^{19}\,\mathrm{n/cm^2}$ the concentrations of $^{236}$U are found to be sufficiently low that the measured $^{236}$U/$^{235}$U ratios become unreliable. We also derive and test diagnostics for determining sample cooling times in situations where very low burnup and very long cooling times render many standard diagnostics, such as the $^{241}$Am/$^{241}$Pu ratio, impractical. We find that using several fragment ratios are necessary to detect the presence of systematic errors, such as fractionation.
Instrumentation and Detectors,Materials Science,Nuclear Experiment,Nuclear Theory
What problem does this paper attempt to address?