Abstract:The evolutionary robotics field offers the possibility of autonomously generating robots that are adapted to desired tasks by iteratively optimising across successive generations of robots with varying configurations until a high-performing candidate is found. The prohibitive time and cost of actually building this many robots means that most evolutionary robotics work is conducted in simulation, but to apply evolved robots to real-world problems, they must be implemented in hardware, which brings new challenges. This paper explores in detail the design of an example system for realising diverse evolved robot bodies, and specifically how this interacts with the evolutionary process. We discover that every aspect of the hardware implementation introduces constraints that change the evolutionary space, and exploring this interplay between hardware constraints and evolution is the key contribution of this paper. In simulation, any robot that can be defined by a suitable genetic representation can be implemented and evaluated, but in hardware, real-world limitations like manufacturing/assembly constraints and electrical power delivery mean that many of these robots cannot be built, or will malfunction in operation. This presents the novel challenge of how to constrain an evolutionary process within the space of evolvable phenotypes to only those regions that are practically feasible: the viable phenotype space. Methods of phenotype filtering and repair were introduced to address this, and found to degrade the diversity of the robot population and impede traversal of the exploration space. Furthermore, the degrees of freedom permitted by the hardware constraints were found to be poorly matched to the types of morphological variation that would be the most useful in the target environment. Consequently, the ability of the evolutionary process to generate robots with effective adaptations was greatly reduced. The conclusions from this are twofold. 1) Designing a hardware platform for evolving robots requires different thinking, in which all design decisions should be made with reference to their impact on the viable phenotype space. 2) It is insufficient to just evolve robots in simulation without detailed consideration of how they will be implemented in hardware, because the hardware constraints have a profound impact on the evolutionary space.

Adapting Low-Cost Platforms for Robotics Research

Low-cost commercial LEGO platform for mobile robotics

Real-Time Hardware-in-the-Loop Emulation of Path Tracking in Low-Cost Agricultural Robots

HeRo 2.0: A Low-Cost Robot for Swarm Robotics Research

Design and Development of a Research Oriented Low Cost Robotics Platform with a Novel Dynamic Global Path Planning Approach

Lessons Learned from Real-World Experiments with DyRET: the Dynamic Robot for Embodied Testing

A Low-cost Mobile Robot Platform with ARM Embedded System

A Cost-Effective Test Bench for Evaluating Safe Human-Robot Interaction in Mobile Robotics

Optimization-Based System Identification and Moving Horizon Estimation Using Low-Cost Sensors for a Miniature Car-Like Robot

Environmental Adaptation of Robot Morphology and Control Through Real-World Evolution

A software toolkit and hardware platform for investigating and comparing robot autonomy algorithms in simulation and reality

HeROS: a miniaturised platform for research and development on Heterogeneous RObotic Systems

Design and Implementation of an Omnidirectional Mobile Robot Platform with Unified I/O Interfaces

The Cambridge RoboMaster: An Agile Multi-Robot Research Platform

RB5 Low-Cost Explorer: Implementing Autonomous Long-Term Exploration on Low-Cost Robotic Hardware

Practical hardware for evolvable robots

SMARTmBOT: A ROS2-based Low-cost and Open-source Mobile Robot Platform

A Novel Real-Time MATLAB/Simulink/LEGO EV3 Platform for Academic Use in Robotics and Computer Science

AV4EV: Open-Source Modular Autonomous Electric Vehicle Platform for Making Mobility Research Accessible

A remote lab for experiments with a team of mobile robots