Inferring Personal Economic Status from Social Network Location

Shaojun Luo,Flaviano Morone,Carlos Sarraute,Matías Travizano,Hernán A. Makse
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15227
2017-04-05
Abstract:It is commonly believed that patterns of social ties affect individuals' economic status. Here, we translate this concept into an operational definition at the network level, which allows us to infer the economic wellbeing of individuals through a measure of their location and influence in the social network. We analyze two large-scale sources: telecommunications and financial data of a whole country's population. Our results show that an individual's location, measured as the optimal collective influence to the structural integrity of the social network, is highly correlated with personal economic status. The observed social network patterns of influence mimics the patterns of economic inequality. For pragmatic use and validation, we carry out a marketing campaign that shows a three-fold increase in response rate by targeting individuals identified by our social network metrics as compared to random targeting. Our strategy can also be useful in maximizing the effects of large-scale economic stimulus policies.
Physics and Society,Social and Information Networks
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem this paper attempts to address is inferring individual economic status through social network positions. Specifically, the authors aim to translate the relationship between social connection patterns and individual economic status into network-level operational definitions, thereby inferring economic well-being by measuring an individual's position and influence within social networks. The paper analyzes two large-scale data sources: telecom data and financial data of an entire national population. The findings indicate that an individual's position in the network (measured by the collective influence metric) is highly correlated with their personal economic status. Additionally, the paper explores how these social network metrics can be utilized to maximize the effectiveness of targeted marketing and social intervention policies. ### Main Research Questions: 1. **The relationship between social network position and individual economic status**: Can an individual's economic status be accurately predicted by analyzing their position and influence within social networks? 2. **Effectiveness of the collective influence metric**: Can the Collective Influence (CI) metric effectively capture an individual's importance and economic status within social networks? 3. **Practical application validation**: How effective is targeted marketing based on social network metrics? Compared to randomly selected target groups, can marketing strategies based on network positions significantly improve response rates? ### Research Methods: - **Data Sources**: Combined telecom data and financial data of bank customers from a Latin American country. - **Network Construction**: Constructed social networks from phone call and SMS metadata, and filtered out non-human nodes using machine learning models. - **Network Metrics**: Used various network centrality metrics (such as degree centrality, PageRank, k-shell index, and collective influence CI) to measure an individual's position and influence within the network. - **Statistical Analysis**: Evaluated the relationship between network position and individual economic status through correlation analysis and covariance analysis. - **Practical Application**: Validated the effectiveness of targeted marketing strategies based on network positions through a marketing campaign. ### Main Findings: - **High correlation between collective influence and economic status**: There is a high correlation between the collective influence metric (CI) and individual economic status, especially when combined with age factors, with a correlation coefficient of R²=0.99. - **Network characteristics of high economic status individuals**: High economic status individuals (top 1%) exhibit unique connection patterns in social networks, with higher collective influence, while low economic status individuals (bottom 10%) show lower collective influence. - **Significant effectiveness of targeted marketing**: Marketing activities based on the collective influence metric achieved a response rate three times higher than randomly selected target groups and five times higher than low collective influence individuals. ### Conclusion: This study successfully demonstrates a strong correlation between social network positions and individual economic status through large-scale data and network analysis methods. The collective influence metric (CI) is proven to be an effective tool for targeted marketing and the design of social intervention policies. This finding not only provides a new perspective for socioeconomics but also offers strong support for practical applications.