Surface Proofs for Nonsymmetric Linear Logic (Extended Abstract)

Lawrence Dunn,Jamie Vicary

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.238.4

2017-01-18

Abstract:We show that a proof in multiplicative linear logic can be represented as a decorated surface, such that two proofs are logically equivalent just when their surfaces are geometrically equivalent. This is an extended abstract for <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1601.05372" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.05372">arXiv:1601.05372</a>.

Logic in Computer Science

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to determine how to judge whether two proofs should be regarded as equivalent in non - symmetric multiplicative linear logic. Specifically, the author proposes a new method, that is, representing proofs as geometric surfaces embedded in three - dimensional space and defining the equivalence relations between these surfaces.

### Core of the problem
1. **Proof equivalence**: In logic, determining when two proofs should be regarded as equivalent is a core problem. Traditional linear logic reasons about resources through propositions, but resources cannot be copied or ignored like propositions.

2. **Geometric representation**: The author proposes to interpret proofs in multiplicative linear logic as geometric surfaces and define the equivalence of these surfaces. Specifically, if one surface can be deformed into another surface, then these two surfaces are equivalent.

### Main contributions
- **Main theorem**: The main theorem of the paper shows that in non - symmetric multiplicative linear logic, two proofs have the same interpretation in the free ∗-autonomous category if and only if their corresponding surfaces are equivalent. It is expressed by the formula as follows:

\[
\text{Two sequent proofs in nonsymmetric multiplicative linear logic have equal interpretations in the free } *-\text{autonomous category just when their surfaces are equivalent.}
\]

- **Comparison with existing methods**: The author's method has several advantages compared with the existing proof nets. For example, the correctness is local, and any well - typed combination will produce a valid proof object without the need to verify global properties. In addition, the author's concept of equivalence is more extensive, and sometimes proof equivalence can be established in fewer steps.

### Application background
- **Topology and linear logic**: The paper points out that topological ideas are closely related to linear logic. The original proof nets are topological objects, and Melliès has shown that ribbon topology can provide a decision procedure for the correctness of proof nets. The author's method further develops this idea and provides a new perspective through three - dimensional geometric surfaces.

### Technical contributions
- **Coherence theorem of Frobenius pseudo - monoids**: The author's technical contribution lies in the direct algebraic proof of the coherence theorem of Frobenius pseudo - monoids, which is more suitable for logical purposes and more flexible than the existing topological proofs based on Morse theory.

In conclusion, this paper provides a new and intuitive solution for proof equivalence in non - symmetric multiplicative linear logic by introducing the concept of geometric surfaces and shows the advantages of this method over traditional methods.