Abstract:Undergraduate quantum mechanics focuses on teaching through a wavefunction approach in the position-space representation. This leads to a differential equation perspective for teaching the material. However, we know that abstract representation-independent approaches often work better with students, by comparing student reactions to learning the series solution of the harmonic oscillator versus the abstract operator method. Because one can teach all of the solvable quantum problems using a similar abstract method, it brings up the question, which is likely to lead to a better student understanding? In work at Georgetown University and with edX, we have been teaching a class focused on an operator-forward viewpoint, which we like to call operator mechanics. It teaches quantum mechanics in a representation-independent fashion and allows for most of the math to be algebraic, rather than based on differential equations. It relies on four fundamental operator identities -- (i) the Leibniz rule for commutators; (ii) the Hadamard lemma; (iii) the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula; and (iv) the exponential disentangling identity. These identities allow one to solve eigenvalues, eigenstates and wavefunctions for all analytically solvable problems (including some not often included in undergraduate curricula, such as the Morse potential or the Poschl-Teller potential). It also allows for more advanced concepts relevant for quantum sensing, such as squeezed states, to be introduced in a simpler format than is conventionally done. In this paper, we illustrate the three approaches of matrix mechanics, wave mechanics, and operator mechanics, we show how one organizes a class in this new format, we summarize the experiences we have had with teaching quantum mechanics in this fashion and we describe how it allows us to focus the quantum curriculum on more modern 21st century topics appropriate for the

Student difficulties with representations of quantum operators corresponding to observables

Student difficulties with quantum states while translating state vectors in Dirac notation to wave functions in position and momentum representations

Student difficulties with determining expectation values in quantum mechanics

A Review of Student Difficulties in Upper-Level Quantum Mechanics

Surveying Students' Understanding of Quantum Mechanics

Students’ Difficulties with the Dirac Delta Function in Quantum Mechanics

Assessing and improving student understanding of quantum mechanics

Student understanding of Fermi energy, the Fermi-Dirac distribution and total electronic energy of a free electron gas

Students’ Difficulties with Partial Differential Equations in Quantum Mechanics

Student understanding of quantum mechanics at the beginning of graduate instruction

Students’ Difficulties with Solving Bound and Scattering State Problems in Quantum Mechanics

Upper-division student difficulties with the Dirac delta function

Student difficulties with the corrections to the energy spectrum of the hydrogen atom for the intermediate field Zeeman effect

Framing Difficulties in Quantum Mechanics

Should we trade off higher-level mathematics for abstraction to improve student understanding of quantum mechanics?

Implementation and goals of quantum optics experiments in undergraduate instructional labs

Challenges in addressing student difficulties with basics and change of basis for two-state quantum systems using a multiple-choice question sequence in online and in-person classes

Cognitive Issues in Learning Advanced Physics: An Example from Quantum Mechanics

Surveying Instructors' Attitudes and Approaches to Teaching Quantum Mechanics

Student evaluation of more or better experimental data in classical and quantum mechanics

Characterizing and monitoring student discomfort in upper-division quantum mechanics