Abstract:Aim The aim was to understand the representativeness and accuracy of expert range maps and to explore alternative methods for mapping species distributions accurately. Location Global. Time period Contemporary. Major taxa studied Terrestrial vertebrates and Odonata. Methods We analysed the biases in 50,768 animal International Union for Conservation of Nature, Global Assessment of Reptile Distributions and BirdLife species maps and assessed the links between these maps and existing political boundaries and various non-ecological boundaries to assess their accuracy for certain types of analyses. We cross-referenced each species map with data from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility to assess whether maps captured the whole range of a species and what percentage of occurrence points fell within the assessed range of the species. In addition, we used a number of different methods to map diversity patterns and compared these with high-resolution models of distribution patterns. Results On average, 20-30% of the non-coastal range boundaries of species overlapped with administrative national boundaries. In total, 60% of areas with the highest spatial turnover in species (high densities of species range boundaries marking high levels of shift in the community of species present) occurred at political boundaries, which was especially common in Southeast Asia. Different biases existed for different taxa, with gridded analysis in reptiles, river basins in Odonata (except the Americas) and county boundaries for amphibians in the USA. On average, up to half (25-46%) of the recorded range points of species fell outside their mapped distributions. Filtered minimum convex polygons performed better than expert range maps in reproducing modelled diversity patterns. Main conclusions Expert range maps showed high bias at administrative borders in all taxa, but this was highest at the transition from tropical to subtropical regions. The methods used were inconsistent across space, time and taxa, and the ranges mapped did not match species distribution data. Alternative approaches can reconstruct patterns of distribution better than expert maps, and data-driven approaches are needed to provide reliable alternatives to gain a better understanding of species distributions.

Effectiveness of Adjacent and Bivariate Maps in Communicating Global Sensitivity Analysis for Geodiversity Assessment

A streamlined approach to uncertainty and sensitivity analysis for models with spatial outputs with an example from geodiversity assessment

Spatial cross-validation is not the right way to evaluate map accuracy

Effectively and Accurately Mapping Global Biodiversity Patterns for Different Regions and Taxa

Spatial Global Sensitivity Analysis of High Resolution classified topographic data use in 2D urban flood modelling

USING THE GEOSPATIAL MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS MODEL AND METHODS FOR SOIL DEGRADATION RISK MAPPING

Mapping Terrestrial Conservation: Showcasing Model Assessment for Map Performance Evaluation

Visualization for better understanding global sensitivity analysis results: The case of safety assessment of radioactive waste disposal

Using Eye Tracking To Explore The Impacts Of Geography Courses On Map-Based Spatial Ability

A CyberGIS Approach to Spatiotemporally Explicit Uncertainty and Global Sensitivity Analysis for Agent-Based Modeling of Vector-Borne Disease Transmission

Geomorphology – SI geoheritage, cultural geomorphology and geotourism

Comprehensive decision-strategy space exploration for efficient territorial planning strategies

GLOBAL sensitivity analysis, GIS and multi‐criteria evaluation for a sustainable planning of a hazardous waste disposal site in Spain

GIScience Theory Based Assessment of Spatial Disparity of Geodetic Control Points Location

Comparative Assessment of Two Global Sensitivity Approaches Considering Model and Parameter Uncertainty

Evaluating the impact of visualization of wildfire hazard upon decision-making under uncertainty

Geodiversity underpins biodiversity but the relations can be complex: Implications from two biodiversity proxies

Data Type Agnostic Visual Sensitivity Analysis

Impact of travel time uncertainties on modeling of spatial accessibility: a comparison of street data sources

The influence of scale-dependent geodiversity on species distribution models in a biodiversity hotspot

Importance of spatial predictor variable selection in machine learning applications -- Moving from data reproduction to spatial prediction