Progression analysis versus traditional methods to quantify slowing of disease progression in Alzheimer's disease

Linus Jönsson,Milana Ivkovic,Alireza Atri,Ron Handels,Anders Gustavsson,Julie Hviid Hahn-Pedersen,Teresa León,Mathias Lilja,Jens Gundgaard,Lars Lau Raket
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-024-01413-y
2024-02-29
Alzheimer s Research & Therapy
Abstract:The clinical meaningfulness of the effects of recently approved disease-modifying treatments (DMT) in Alzheimer's disease is under debate. Available evidence is limited to short-term effects on clinical rating scales which may be difficult to interpret and have limited intrinsic meaning to patients. The main value of DMTs accrues over the long term as they are expected to cause a delay or slowing of disease progression. While awaiting such evidence, the translation of short-term effects to time delays or slowing of progression could offer a powerful and readily interpretable representation of clinical outcomes.
neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?