Application of ultra-low-dose CT in 3D printing of distal radial fractures

Mengqiang Xiao,Meng Zhang,Ming Lei,Xiaolu Hu,Qingshan Wang,Yanxia Chen,Jingzhi Ye,Rulin Xu,Jun Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109488
IF: 4.531
2021-02-01
European Journal of Radiology
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Purpose</h3><p>To explore the effect of ultra-low-dose computed tomography (CT) on three-dimensional (3D) printing models and the diagnosis of wrist fractures.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Method</h3><p>This study enrolled 76 patients with distal radial fractures (DRFs). All patients underwent 320-row detector CT and were divided randomly into two groups. In Group A, 38 patients were scanned with the standard-dose protocol using a tube voltage of 120 kV and current of 100 mA. In Group B, 38 patients were scanned with the ultra-low-dose protocol using a tube voltage of 80 kV and current of 10 mA. For objective image quality assessment, the noise, CT number, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured. Subjectively, two experienced orthopaedic surgeons blinded to the scan parameters evaluated the clarity of the 3D printing model and fracture line using a 3-point scale (the diagnosis was considered acceptable with scores ≥2). The mean radiation dose was calculated. The diagnostic performances for the fractures between the two groups were compared.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>The effective radiation dose was significantly reduced by 97.1 % in Group B, compared to Group A (0.28 ± 0.05<em>vs</em>. 9.75 ± 2.23 μSv, respectively). Quantitative objective image quality parameters (<em>e.g.</em>, CNR, SNR, and CT numbers) were higher in the standard-dose group (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). However, there was no difference in subjective scoring of the 3D printing model. Although the fracture line score was higher in Group A (2.92±0.27 <em>vs</em>. 2.16 ± 0.37; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), the diagnostic performance of the two groups was consistent (all scores ≥2). There were no statistically significant differences in the sensitivity, specificity or accuracy between standard-dose group and ultra-low-dose group.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusions</h3><p>The ultra-low-dose protocol effectively reduced the radiation dose by 97.1 %, while maintaining the image quality for diagnosis of DRFs. Therefore, this protocol can meet the needs of 3D printing models for preoperative assessments.</p>
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?