Simulating the Impact of Future Climate Change and Ecological Restoration on Trade-Offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in Two Ecological Shelters and Three Belts in China

Liang-Jie Wang,Shuai Ma,Yong-Peng Qiao,Jin-Chi Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17217849
IF: 4.614
2020-10-26
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Abstract:Development of suitable ecological protection and restoration policies for sustainable management needs to assess the potential impacts of future land use and climate change on ecosystem services. The two ecological shelters and three belts (TSTB) are significant for improving ecosystem services and ensuring China’s and global ecological security. In this study, we simulated land use in 2050 and estimated the spatial distribution pattern of net primary productivity (NPP), water yield, and soil conservation from 2010 to 2050 under future climate change. The results showed that water yield, NPP, and soil conservation exhibited a spatial pattern of decreasing from southeast to northwest, while in terms of the temporal pattern, water yield and NPP increased, but soil conservation decreased. Water yield was mainly influenced by precipitation, NPP was affected by temperature and implementation of ecological restoration, and soil conservation was controlled by precipitation and slope. There was a strong spatial heterogeneity between trade-offs and synergies. In terms of the temporal, with the combination of climate change and ecological restoration, there was a synergistic relationship between water yield and NPP. However, the relationships between water yield and soil conservation, and between NPP and soil conservation were characterized by trade-offs. In the process of ecological construction, it is necessary to consider the differences between overall and local trade-offs and synergies, as well as formulate sustainable ecological management policies according to local conditions. Understanding the response of ecosystem services to future climate change and land use policies can help address the challenges posed by climate change and achieve sustainable management of natural resources.
public, environmental & occupational health,environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main aim of this paper is to study the impact of future climate change and ecological restoration on the trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services within two ecological protection zones and three ecological belts (abbreviated as TSTB) in China. Specifically, the study simulates land use in 2050 and evaluates the spatial distribution patterns and trends of change in net primary productivity (NPP), water yield, and soil retention capacity under two future climate change scenarios (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5). The core objectives of the paper include: 1. **Quantitative Assessment**: Using the InVEST model and CASA model to quantify water yield, soil retention capacity, and NPP. 2. **Impact Assessment**: Evaluating the impact of future land use changes and climate change on these ecosystem services. 3. **Trade-off and Synergy Analysis**: Quantifying the trade-offs and synergies between different ecosystem services and analyzing their spatiotemporal distribution characteristics. 4. **Sustainable Management Strategies**: Proposing different sustainable management strategies for each protection zone based on local conditions. The study area—TSTB consists of five parts: Southern Hilly and Mountainous Belt (SHMB), Sichuan-Yunnan and Loess Plateau Ecological Protection Zone (CLPS), Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Ecological Protection Zone (TPES), Northeast Forest Belt (NEFB), and Northern Sand Prevention Belt (NSPB). These areas face a series of ecological problems caused by the unreasonable use of resources, such as forest and grassland degradation, land desertification, and severe soil erosion. By coupling land use models, climate models, and ecosystem service models, researchers can predict the impact of future climate change and ecological restoration measures on ecosystem services, thereby providing scientific evidence for policymakers to formulate better ecological protection policies. This is of great significance for maintaining national ecological security and achieving sustainable development.