The Simplified Thrombo-Inflammatory Score as a Novel Predictor of All-Cause Mortality in Patients with Heart Failure: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Meng-Die Cheng,Ying-Ying Zheng,Xing-Yan Zhang,Tuersun Ruzeguli,Yisimayili Sureya,Yisha Didaer,Mahemuti Ailiman,Jin-Ying Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/jir.s452544
IF: 4.5
2024-03-20
Journal of Inflammation Research
Abstract:Meng-Die Cheng, 1 Ying-Ying Zheng, 2 Xing-Yan Zhang, 2 Tuersun Ruzeguli, 2 Yisimayili Sureya, 2 Yisha Didaer, 2 Mahemuti Ailiman, 2 Jin-Ying Zhang 1 1 Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, People's Republic of China; 2 Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, 830054, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Jin-Ying Zhang, Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1, Jianshe Road, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China, Tel +86-0371- 67967641, Email Ying-Ying Zheng, Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, No. 137, Liyushan Road, Urumqi, People's Republic of China, Tel +86-0991-4361702, Email Background: The simplified thrombo-inflammatory score (sTIPS) has recently emerged as a novel prognostic score. Hence, we investigated the prognostic value of sTIPS for predicting long-term mortality in patients with heart failure (HF). Methods: A total of 3741 patients were analyzed in this study. The sTIPS was calculated based on the white blood cell count (WBC) and the mean platelet volume to platelet count (MPV/PC) ratio at admission. The mean follow-up time was 22.75 months. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to investigate the associations between the sTIPS and all-cause mortality (ACM). Results: In the whole study population, multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that patients in both the sTIPS 2 and sTIPS 1 groups had significantly increased risk of ACM as compared with patients in the sTIPS 0 group (hazard ratio [HR]=1.706, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.405– 2.072, P< 0.001 and HR = 1.431, 95% CI 1.270– 1.612, P< 0.001). The same significant trend was observed in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients (sTIPS1 vs sTIPS0: HR = 1.366, 95% CI 1.100– 1.697, P = 0.005; sTIPS2 vs sTIPS0: HR = 1.995, 95% CI 1.460– 2.725, P< 0.001). However, only sTIPS 1 group had a significantly increased the risk of ACM compared to the sTIPS 0 group among patients with HFmrEF (sTIPS1 vs sTIPS0: HR = 1.648, 95% CI 1.238– 2.194, P = 0.001) and HFrEF (sTIPS1 vs sTIPS0: HR = 1.322, 95% CI 1.021– 1.712, P = 0.035). Conclusion: sTIPS is useful in predicting risk for long-term mortality in patients with HF. Keywords: simplified thrombo-inflammatory score, heart failure, prognosis, all-cause mortality HF is a progressive clinical syndrome caused by abnormal cardiac structure or function in which patients have typical symptoms such as breathlessness, ankle swelling, and fatigue, as well as clinical signs related to an abnormality of cardiac structure or function. 1 HF is a major and growing public health problem, with its high morbidity and mortality causing heavy economic burden. 2 Despite significant improvements in treatment and survival of HF, prognosis remains poor. 3 Thus, precise risk stratification and early identification of modifiable risk factors are crucial for improving outcomes in patients with HF. Several biomarkers had been reported for predicting clinical prognosis of HF patients, such as N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), 4 uric acid (UA), 5 WBC, 6 serum cholesterol levels, 7 PC, 8 MPV 9 and so on. However, the pathogenesis and pathophysiological features of HF are complicated and heterogeneous, and a single index cannot accurately predict disease severity and prognosis in HF patients. In recent years, the risk stratification scores that is based on multiple clinical variables provide novel insights into prognostic stratification of cardiovascular diseases(CVD), for example, Intermountain Risk Score, 10,11 Naples Score, 12 ABC score, 13 etc. These have provided the possible approaches to develop a reliable prognostic model for HF patients. Both inflammation and thrombosis play an essential role in the development and progression of HF. 14 It is well - established that inflammation and thrombosis are interdependent. Inflammation can induce thrombosis, and thrombosis can further aggravate the development of inflammation. 15 Therefore, these two key pathophysiologic processes are proposed to be studied and managed as a common entity under the concept of thrombus inflammation. Recently, sTIPS, a novel prognostic score based on thrombo-inflammatory status, has been introduced. 16 The sTIPS combines the predictive information derived from platelet function/count and leukocyte count. Previous study has demonstrated that s -Abstract Truncated-
immunology