Abstract:Background: Graphical models have long been used to describe biological networks for a variety of important tasks such as the determination of key biological parameters, and the structure of graphical model ultimately determines whether such unknown parameters can be unambiguously obtained from experimental observations (i.e., the identifiability problem). Limited by resources or technical capacities, complex biological networks are usually partially observed in experiment, which thus introduces latent variables into the corresponding graphical models. A number of previous studies have tackled the parameter identifiability problem for graphical models such as linear structural equation models (SEMs) with or without latent variables. However, the limited resolution and efficiency of existing approaches necessarily calls for further development of novel structural identifiability analysis algorithms. Results: An efficient structural identifiability analysis algorithm is developed in this study for a broad range of network structures. The proposed method adopts the Wright's path coefficient method to generate identifiability equations in forms of symbolic polynomials, and then converts these symbolic equations to binary matrices (called identifiability matrix). Several matrix operations are introduced for identifiability matrix reduction with system equivalency maintained. Based on the reduced identifiability matrices, the structural identifiability of each parameter is determined. A number of benchmark models are used to verify the validity of the proposed approach. Finally, the network module for influenza A virus replication is employed as a real example to illustrate the application of the proposed approach in practice. Conclusions: The proposed approach can deal with cyclic networks with latent variables. The key advantage is that it intentionally avoids symbolic computation and is thus highly efficient. Also, this method is capable of determining the identifiability of each single parameter and is thus of higher resolution in comparison with many existing approaches. Overall, this study provides a basis for systematic examination and refinement of graphical models of biological networks from the identifiability point of view, and it has a significant potential to be extended to more complex network structures or high-dimensional systems.

Benchmarking tools for a priori identifiability analysis

Structural Identifiability of Dynamic Systems Biology Models

A systematic approach for doing an \textit{a priori} identifiability study of dynamical nonlinear models

Structural and practical identifiability analysis in bioengineering: a beginner's guide

Navigating the landscape of parameter identifiability methods: A workflow recommendation for model development

Employing observability rank conditions for taking into account experimental information a priori

A Systematic Computational Framework for Practical Identifiability Analysis in Mathematical Models arising from biology

A Preposterior Analysis to Predict Identifiability in the Experimental Calibration of Computer Models

Identifying Latent Dynamic Components in Biological Systems

System identifiability in a time-evolving agent-based model

Minimally sufficient experimental design using identifiability analysis

Database for identifiability properties of linear compartmental models

Uncertainty Analysis for Non-identifiable Dynamical Systems: Profile Likelihoods, Bootstrapping and More

Structural identifiability of cyclic graphical models of biological networks with latent variables

Preposterior Analysis to Select Experimental Responses for Improving Identifiability in Model Uncertainty Quantification

Surrogate Preposterior Analyses for Predicting and Enhancing Identifiability in Model Calibration

On Finding and Using Identifiable Parameter Combinations in Nonlinear Dynamic Systems Biology Models and COMBOS: A Novel Web Implementation

Lessons Learned from Quantitative Dynamical Modeling in Systems Biology

STRIKE-GOLDD 4.0: user-friendly, efficient analysis of structural identifiability and observability

Examining the impact of forcing function inputs on structural identifiability

Two new user‐friendly methods to assess pharmacometric parameter identifiability on categorical and continuous scales