Effect of operating conditions on the retention of ruthenium tetroxide (RuO 4 ) by different solid traps

Thibault Bagnol,Julie Nguyen-Sadassivame,Marie-Noëlle Ohnet,Bruno Azambre,Christophe Volkringer,Thierry Loiseau,Laurent Cantrel,Philippe Nerisson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2024.154941
IF: 3.555
2024-01-29
Journal of Nuclear Materials
Abstract:Mitigation of gaseous RuO 4 is an important issue in nuclear safety in order to reduce potential radiological consequences, either in the context of severe accident arising on pressurized water reactors (oxidizing conditions) or in reprocessing plants (loss of cooling of fission product storage tanks). For the first time, RuO 4 trapping was compared using three kinds of materials acting as solid traps: a functionalized MOF UiO-66-NH 2 , an amine-modified silica and a commercial cerium dioxide. Different experimental conditions of temperature, humidity and gas composition were investigated in order to mimic those prevailing under accident conditions at filtered containment venting system (FCVS) level or in ventilation ducts (gas mixture). At 50°C, the efficiency of UiO-66-NH 2 for RuO 4 trapping was both very high in dry gas and in presence of steam with decontamination factor (DF) in the range 10 4 -10 5 . Under more severe conditions, the retention performances slightly decrease, especially when NO 2 was present in the feed gas due to some poisoning of adsorption sites. In presence of amino-modified silica, breakthrough of RuO 4 (g) occurred at an earlier stage due to its inferior adsorption capacity but the performances of the trap did not deteriorate in presence of steam and NO 2 in gas mixture. Under similar conditions, cerium dioxide showed no retention of RuO 4 (g).
materials science, multidisciplinary,nuclear science & technology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?