Identification of consensus head and neck cancer-associated microbiota signatures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 16S rRNA and The Cancer Microbiome Atlas datasets

Kenny Yeo,Runhao Li,Fangmeinuo Wu,George Bouras,Linh T.H. Mai,Eric Smith,Peter-John Wormald,Rowan Valentine,Alkis James Psaltis,Sarah Vreugde,Kevin Fenix
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001799
2024-02-03
Journal of Medical Microbiology
Abstract:Introduction. Multiple reports have attempted to describe the tumour microbiota in head and neck cancer (HNSC). Gap statement. However, these have failed to produce a consistent microbiota signature, which may undermine understanding the importance of bacterial-mediated effects in HNSC. Aim. The aim of this study is to consolidate these datasets and identify a consensus microbiota signature in HNSC. Methodology. We analysed 12 published HNSC 16S rRNA microbial datasets collected from cancer, cancer-adjacent and non-cancer tissues to generate a consensus microbiota signature. These signatures were then validated using The Cancer Microbiome Atlas (TCMA) database and correlated with the tumour microenvironment phenotypes and patient's clinical outcome. Results. We identified a consensus microbial signature at the genus level to differentiate between HNSC sample types, with cancer and cancer-adjacent tissues sharing more similarity than non-cancer tissues. Univariate analysis on 16S rRNA datasets identified significant differences in the abundance of 34 bacterial genera among the tissue types. Paired cancer and cancer-adjacent tissue analyses in 16S rRNA and TCMA datasets identified increased abundance in Fusobacterium in cancer tissues and decreased abundance of Atopobium , Rothia and Actinomyces in cancer-adjacent tissues. Furthermore, these bacteria were associated with different tumour microenvironment phenotypes. Notably, high Fusobacterium signature was associated with high neutrophil (r=0.37, P <0.0001), angiogenesis (r=0.38, P <0.0001) and granulocyte signatures (r=0.38, P <0.0001) and better overall patient survival [continuous: HR 0.8482, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.7758–0.9273, P =0.0003]. Conclusion. Our meta-analysis demonstrates a consensus microbiota signature for HNSC, highlighting its potential importance in this disease.
microbiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?