Abstract:I have argued that early human embryos are not human beings, and do not have normal rights. Like human sperm and ova, they are both alive and biologically human. However, they lack the physiological development necessary to sustain a capacity for sentience. If Ford is right, then they are not yet individual human organisms. But the more important point is that their lack of a capacity for sentience makes them inappropriate candidates for the ascription of moral rights. Thus, research on human embryos produced in vitro is not a wrong against them--at least so long as experimentally manipulated embryos are not returned to the womb, or artificially gestated to a stage at which they might become sentient. Some of the more difficult issues about embryo experimentation involve the rights of women as experimental subject and donors. The consent of both male and female gamete donors should normally be required for the production or experimental use of IVF embryos. (Possible exceptions might include cases in which one or both progenitors have died, and the survivor or other responsible family member wished to donate the (frozen) IVF embryos for research or other uses.) However, it is women's rights that are most apt to be endangered, for example, if the large scale therapeutic or commercial use of human embryos leads to a demand for large numbers of ova. Thus, it is vital that researchers and policy-makers heed feminist concerns about embryo research and the new biomedical technologies it may yield. Given adequate information and appropriate procedural protections, women are capable of making autonomous decisions about donating ova or embryos for biomedical research. But regulatory safeguards are needed to ensure against their being coerced, deceived, or manipulated into becoming ovum or embryo donors. As Daniel Callahan has detailed, biomedical technology has reached the point where we can no longer afford to provide everyone with all of the innovative therapies that might prove beneficial (Callahan, 1989, p 523). Thus, questions about the just and cost-effective distribution of medical resources will become increasingly difficult and important. Among these questions will be whether it is wise or just to invest large sums in the development of innovative methods of assisting human reproduction. We must also consider the interests of future persons who may suffer because of the methods used to bring them into existence.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

The rise and demise of a collection of human fetuses at Mount Holyoke College

Ex utero: live human fetal research and the films of Davenport Hooker

"When does human life begin?" teaching human embryology in the context of the American abortion debate

Ethical Aspects of Human Embryo Collections: A Historically Grounded Approach to the Blechschmidt Collection at the University of Göttingen

The Dubious Practice of Sensationalizing Anatomical Dissection (and Death) in the Humanities Literature

The Kyoto Collection of Human Embryos and Fetuses: History and Recent Advancements in Modern Methods

"My Dead Body": Development, production, and reception of a documentary that publicly displays the dissection of a human donor

Ethical dilemmas in skeletal collection utilization: Implications of the Black Lives Matter movement on the anatomical and anthropological sciences

#Headlesspreggos: challenging visual imaginaries of pregnancy and reproduction

Capital punishment and anatomy: history and ethics of an ongoing association

Disposition of unused cryopreserved embryos: opportunities and liabilities

The madness they endured: A biocultural examination of women's experiences of structural violence within 20th-century Missouri state mental hospitals

Foetus or child? Abortion discourse and attributions of humanness

Exercises in ethically engaged work in biological anthropology

Borderlands of Life: IVF Embryos and the Law in the United States, United Kingdom, and Germany

Abortion and America's ethical consciousness

Spectacular reproduction: Ron's Angels and mechanical reproduction in the age of ART (assisted reproductive technology)

Embryo manipulation and experimentation

How technology is reframing the abortion debate

Legal personhood and frozen embryos: implications for fertility patients and providers in post-Roe America

Selling bits and pieces of humans to make babies: The gift of the magi revisited