Abstract:Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and reasoning ability of ChatGPT in diagnosing retinal vascular diseases in the Chinese clinical environment. Materials and Methods We collected 1226 fundus fluorescein angiography reports and corresponding diagnosis written in Chinese, and tested ChatGPT with four prompting strategies (direct diagnosis or diagnosis with explanation and in Chinese or English). Results ChatGPT using English prompt for direct diagnosis achieved the best performance, with F1-score of 80.05%, which was inferior to ophthalmologists (89.35%) but close to ophthalmologist interns (82.69%). Although ChatGPT can derive reasoning process with a low error rate, mistakes such as misinformation (1.96%), and hallucination (0.59%) still exist. Discussion and Conclusions ChatGPT can serve as a helpful medical assistant to provide diagnosis under non-English clinical environments, but there are still performance gaps, language disparity, and errors compared to professionals, which demonstrates the potential limitations and the desiration to continually explore more robust LLMs in ophthalmology practice. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. ### Funding Statement The work is supported by Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number: 82201195). ### Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: Ethics committee/IRB of Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University gave ethical approval for this work.(IRB:[NCT04718532][1]) I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes Data will be made available for research purposes upon request. Data requests are to be directed to jinkai{at}zju.edu.cn. [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT04718532&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F07%2F14%2F2023.06.28.23291931.atom

Examining the Potential of ChatGPT on Biomedical Information Retrieval: Fact-Checking Drug-Disease Associations

Uncovering Language Disparity of ChatGPT in Healthcare: Non-English Clinical Environment for Retinal Vascular Disease Classification (Preprint)

From Answers to Insights: Unveiling the Strengths and Limitations of ChatGPT and Biomedical Knowledge Graphs

Evaluation of ChatGPT Family of Models for Biomedical Reasoning and Classification

Evaluation of ChatGPT as a diagnostic tool for medical learners and clinicians

Abstract 3524: Leveraging ChatGPT for literature-based inference of drug-gene relationships in cancer

Uncovering Language Disparity of ChatGPT in Healthcare: Non-English Clinical Environment for Retinal Vascular Disease Classification

Examining Real-World Medication Consultations and Drug-Herb Interactions: ChatGPT Performance Evaluation

Evaluation of ChatGPT-generated medical responses: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Opportunities and Challenges for ChatGPT and Large Language Models in Biomedicine and Health

Effectiveness of ChatGPT in explaining complex medical reports to patients

Evaluating the capability of ChatGPT in predicting drug–drug interactions: Real‐world evidence using hospitalized patient data

Rare disease diagnosis using knowledge guided retrieval augmentation for ChatGPT

The potential and pitfalls of using a large language model such as ChatGPT, GPT-4, or LLaMA as a clinical assistant.

Using Large Language Models to Support Content Analysis: A Case Study of ChatGPT for Adverse Event Detection

Large Language Models for Efficient Medical Information Extraction

Evaluating the ChatGPT family of models for biomedical reasoning and classification

ChatGPT Assisting Diagnosis of Neuro-ophthalmology Diseases Based on Case Reports

Fact-Checking Generative AI: Ontology-Driven Biological Graphs for Disease-Gene Link Verification

Utility of ChatGPT in Clinical Practice

A critical assessment of using ChatGPT for extracting structured data from clinical notes