Faster Sensitivity Loss around Dense Scotomas than for Overall Macular Sensitivity in Stargardt Disease: ProgStar Report No. 14

Etienne M. Schönbach,Rupert W. Strauss,Mohamed A. Ibrahim,Jessica L. Janes,David G. Birch,Artur V. Cideciyan,Janet S. Sunness,Beatriz Muñoz,Michael S. Ip,SriniVas R. Sadda,Hendrik P.N. Scholl,Hendrik P.N. Scholl,Rupert W. Strauss,Yulia Wolfson,Millena Bittencourt,Syed Mahmood Shah,Mohamed Ahmed,Etienne Schönbach,Kaoru Fujinami,Elias Traboulsi,Justis Ehlers,Meghan Marino,Susan Crowe,Rachael Briggs,Angela Borer,Anne Pinter,Tami Fecko,Nikki Burgnoni,Janet S. Sunness,Carol Applegate,Leslie Russell,Michel Michaelides,Simona Degli Esposti,Anthony Moore,Andrew Webster,Sophie Connor,Jade Barnfield,Zaid Salchi,Clara Alfageme,Victoria McCudden,Maria Pefkianaki,Jonathan Aboshiha,Gerald Liew,Graham Holder,Anthony Robson,Alexa King,Daniela Ivanova Cajas Narvaez,Katy Barnard,Catherine Grigg,Hannah Dunbar,Yetunde Obadeyi,Karine Girard-Claudon,Hilary Swann,Avani Rughani,Charles Amoah,Dominic Carrington,Kanom Bibi,Emerson Ting,Mohamed Nafaz Illiyas,Hamida Begum,Andrew Carter,Anne Georgiou,Selma Lewism,Saddaf Shaheen,Harpreet Shinmar,Linda Burton,Paul Bernstein,Kimberley Wegner,Briana Lauren Sawyer,Bonnie Carlstrom,Kellian Farnsworth,Cyrie Fry,Melissa Chandler,Glen Jenkins,Donnel Creel,David Birch,Yi-Zhong Wang,Luis Rodriguez,Kirsten Locke,Martin Klein,Paulina Mejia,Artur V. Cideciyan,Samuel G. Jacobson,Sharon B. Schwartz,Rodrigo Matsui,Michaela Gruzensky,Jason Charng,Alejandro J. Roman,Eberhart Zrenner,Fadi Nasser,Gesa Astrid Hahn,Barbara Wilhelm,Tobias Peters,Benjamin Beier,Tilman Koenig,Susanne Kramer,José-Alain Sahel,Saddek Mohand-Said,Isabelle Audo,Caroline Laurent-Coriat,Ieva Sliesoraityte,Christina Zeitz,Fiona Boyard,Minh Ha Tran,Mathias Chapon,Céline Chaumette,Juliette Amaudruz,Victoria Ganem,Serge Sancho,Aurore Girmens,Hendrik P.N. Scholl,Rupert W. Strauss,Yulia Wolfson,Syed Mahmood Shah,Mohamed Ahmed,Etienne Schönbach,Robert Wojciechowski,Shazia Khan,David G. Emmert,Dennis Cain,Mark Herring,Jennifer Bassinger,Lisa Liberto,Sheila West,Ann-Margret Ervin,Beatriz Munoz,Xiangrong Kong,Kurt Dreger,Jennifer Jones,Srinivas Sadda,Michael S. Ip,Anamika Jha,Alex Ho,Brendan Kramer,Ngoc Lam,Rita Tawdros,Yong Dong Zhou,Johana Carmona,Akihito Uji,Amirhossein Hariri,Amy Lock,Anthony Elshafei,Anushika Ganegoda,Christine Petrossian,Dennis Jenkins,Edward Strnad,Elmira Baghdasaryan,Eric Ito,Feliz Samson,Gloria Blanquel,Handan Akil,Jhanisus Melendez,Jianqin Lei,Jianyan Huang,Jonathan Chau,Khalil G. Falavarjani,Kristina Espino,Manfred Li,Maria Mendoza,Muneeswar Gupta Nittala,Netali Roded,Nizar Saleh,Ping Huang,Sean Pitetta,Siva Balasubramanian,Sophie Leahy,Sowmya J. Srinivas,Swetha B. Velaga,Teresa Margaryan,Tudor Tepelus,Tyler Brown,Wenying Fan,Yamileth Murillo,Yue Shi,Katherine Aguilar,Cynthia Chan,Lisa Santos,Brian Seo,Christopher Sison,Silvia Perez,Stephanie Chao,Kelly Miyasato,Julia Higgins,Zoila Luna,Anita Menchaca,Norma Gonzalez,Vicky Robledo,Karen Carig,Kirstie Baker,David Ellenbogen,Daniel Bluemel,Theo Sanford,Daisy Linares,Mei Tran,Lorane Nava,Michelle Oberoi,Mark Romero,Vivian Chiguil,Grantley Bynum-Bain,Monica Kim,Carolina Mendiguren,Xiwen Huang,Monika Smith,Teresa Margaryan,Natalie Sarreal
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2020.03.020
IF: 5.488
2020-08-01
American Journal of Ophthalmology
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Purpose</h3><p>Mean sensitivity (MS) derived from a standard test grid using microperimetry is a sensitive outcome measure in clinical trials investigating new treatments for degenerative retinal diseases. Here, we hypothesize that the functional decline is faster at the edge of the dense scotoma (eMS) than using overall MS.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Design</h3><p>Multicenter, international, prospective cohort study: ProgStar study (NCT01977846).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Methods</h3><p>Stargardt disease patients (carrying at least one mutation in <em>ABCA4</em>) were followed over 12 months with microperimetry using a Humphrey 10-2 test grid. Custom software was developed to automatically define and selectively follow the test points directly adjacent to dense scotoma points and to calculate their mean sensitivity (eMS).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>Among 361 eyes (185 patients), the mean age was 32.9 ± 15.1. At baseline, MS was 10.4 ± 5.2 dB (N=361) and the eMS was 9.3 ± 3.3 dB (N=335). The yearly progression rate of MS (1.5 ± 2.1 dB/yr) was significantly lower (β = -1.33, p &lt; .001) than for eMS (2.9 ± 2.9 dB/yr). There was no difference in progression rates using automated vs manual grading (β = .09, p = .461).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusions</h3><p>In Stargardt disease, macular sensitivity declines significantly faster at the edge of the dense scotoma than in the overall test grid. An automated, time-efficient approach for extracting and grading eMS is possible and appears valid. Thus, eMS offers a valuable tool and sensitive outcome measure to follow Stargardt patients in clinical trials, allowing clinical trial designs with shorter duration and/or smaller cohorts.</p>
ophthalmology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### The problems the paper attempts to solve This paper aims to explore whether the retinal sensitivity at the dense scotoma edge in Stargardt disease (STGD1) declines faster than the overall macular sensitivity. Specifically, the research hypothesis is that the functional decline rate of the edge - mean sensitivity (eMS) at the dense scotoma edge is faster than the mean sensitivity (MS) of the entire test grid. #### Research background Stargardt disease is a common hereditary retinal degenerative disease, mainly caused by ABCA4 gene mutations. This disease will lead to the gradual loss of function of photoreceptors and retinal pigment epithelial cells in the macular area, and eventually form a dense scotoma. As the disease progresses, these scotomas will expand outward, resulting in a further decline in vision. #### Research objectives 1. **Verify the hypothesis**: Verify whether the sensitivity at the dense scotoma edge declines faster than the overall macular sensitivity. 2. **Develop tools**: Develop an automated and efficient method to extract and evaluate the sensitivity (eMS) at the dense scotoma edge as a sensitive outcome parameter in clinical trials. #### Method overview - **Research design**: Multicenter, international, prospective cohort study (ProgStar Study). - **Participants**: STGD1 patients carrying at least one ABCA4 gene mutation. - **Technical means**: Use Nidek MP - 1 microperimeter for a 12 - month follow - up, and adopt the Humphrey 10 - 2 test grid. - **Data processing**: Custom - made software automatically identifies and calculates the edge - mean sensitivity (eMS) at the dense scotoma edge and compares it with the overall sensitivity (MS). #### Main findings - **Sensitivity changes**: In 361 eyes, the annual progression rate of MS within 1 year was 1.5 ± 2.1 dB/year, while the annual progression rate of eMS was 2.9 ± 2.9 dB/year. The progression of eMS was significantly faster than that of MS (p < 0.001). - **Result verification**: The results of manual scoring were consistent with those of automatic scoring, verifying the effectiveness of the method. - **Relative standard deviation**: The relative standard deviation at the dense scotoma edge was small, indicating that its measurement was more stable. #### Conclusions - In STGD1 patients, the decline rate of macular sensitivity at the dense scotoma edge is significantly faster than that of the entire test grid. - The method of automatically extracting and evaluating the sensitivity at the dense scotoma edge is feasible and effective. - eMS can be used as a sensitive outcome parameter in clinical trials, which is helpful for shortening the trial period or reducing the sample size. Through these findings, the research provides new tools and methods for future clinical trials for STGD1, which can more accurately evaluate the treatment effect.