Abstract:I examine how non-binary people who have considered, or accessed, gender-affirming health care experience accountability to transnormativity using 12 in-depth interviews conducted between 2018 and 2019 in a midwestern American city. I detail how non-binary people who want to embody genders that are still largely culturally unintelligible think about identity, embodiment, and gender dysphoria. Using grounded theory methodology, I find that non-binary identity work around medicalization differs from that of transgender men and women in three primary ways: 1) regarding how they understand and operationalize gender dysphoria, 2) in relation to their embodiment goals, and 3) concerning how they experience pressure to medically transition. Non-binary people describe increased ontological uncertainty about their gender identities when researching gender dysphoria that is contextualized by an internalized sense of accountability to the transnormative expectation for medicalization. They additionally anticipate a potential medicalization paradox, where accessing gender-affirming care leads to a different type of binary misgendering and risks making their gender identities less, rather than more, culturally intelligible to others. Non-binary people also experience external accountability to transnormativity as pressure from trans and medical communities to think about dysphoria as inherently binaristic, embodied, and medically treatable. These findings indicate that non-binary people experience accountability to transnormativity differently than trans men and women. Since non-binary people and their body projects often disrupt the transnormative tropes that are the framework for trans medicine, they find trans therapeutics, and the diagnostic experience of gender dysphoria, uniquely problematic. Non-binary experiences of accountability to transnormativity indicate the need to re-center trans medicine to better accommodate non-normative embodiment desires and focus future diagnostic revisions of gender dysphoria to emphasize the social aspects of trans and non-binary experience.

Gender please, without the gender police: rethinking pain in archetypal narratives of butch, transgender, and FTM masculinity

Bodies in Pain, Pleasure, and Flux: Transgressive Femininity in Japanese Media and Literature

Interrogating global narratives of trans queerness. Well-being and agency? Or more stories of trans trauma?

Gender Stereotypes Explain Disparities in Pain Care and Inform Equitable Policies

Making Choices in Discourse: New Alternative Masculinities Opposing the "Warrior's Rest"

Pain During Incarceration: Searching for Safety in Hypermasculine Correctional Settings

Transgender Imagining and the Danger of Normative Theory

Making intelligible the controversies over femme identities: A functionalist approach to conceptualizing the subversive meanings of femme genders

“Brave Men” and “Emotional Women”: A Theory-Guided Literature Review on Gender Bias in Health Care and Gendered Norms towards Patients with Chronic Pain

Women’s Lived Experiences of Chronic Pain: Faces of Gendered Suffering

Masculine Identity in Modernist Literature

Deconstructing the gender neutrality of chronic illness and disability

What Lies Beyond Their Hurting: Representations of Female Pain and Personhood in Animation

Pain During Incarceration

Exploring the Concept of Manliness in Relation to the Phenomenon of Crying

Can femme be theory? Exploring the epistemological and methodological possibilities of femme

Read like a man: comparing narratives of masculinity in adolescent literature

Troubling genderS and consumer well‐being: Going across, between and beyond the binaries to gender/sex/ual and intersectional diversity

Self-loving in the epidemic years: Carmen Machado's rhetoric of woundedness

A no-man's-land of sex: Reading Stephen Gordon and "her" critics

The struggle with transnormativity: Non-binary identity work, embodiment desires, and experience with gender dysphoria