A Single Center Cross-Sectional Study of Clinical Outcomes
Rami Al-Hader,Justin Nofar,Ahmed Mohamedelkhair,Muhammad Affan,Lonni R. Schultz,Mirela Cerghet
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13175069
IF: 3.9
2024-08-29
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Abstract:Background/Objective: To describe the clinical features and radiological outcomes of patients with spinal cord neurosarcoidosis, treatments, and long-term follow-up for this rare disorder. Methods: A cross-sectional, retrospective medical chart review was performed for all patients with spinal cord neurosarcoidosis treated at a single center between 01/1995 and 12/2020. Radiological imaging, laboratory test results, the type of immunosuppressive therapy, and function test scores were reviewed. Results: We assessed 39 patients with spinal cord neurosarcoidosis (23 men, 16 women, mean age at presentation 46.4 years, SD 10.2 years). The mean (SD) duration of spinal cord neurosarcoidosis at data abstraction was 9.8 (6.3) years. There were 24 patients (62%) with extensive intramedullary lesions, 8 (21%) with multiple patchy intramedullary lesions, 12 (31%) with leptomeningeal involvement, and 7 (18%) with nerve root enhancement. The cervical spine was the most commonly affected region in 33 patients (85%). The most common presenting symptoms were paresthesia/neuropathic pain in 20 (51%) and weakness of extremities in 15 (38%) patients. Most patients (n = 37; 95%) had been treated with corticosteroids at symptom onset, and methotrexate was the most used immunosuppressive therapy (n = 19; 49%). Of 34 patients with follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) available, the median time to improvement per MRI was 10.8 months (95% CI, 6.1–17.0 months). Of 31 patients with MRI enhancement at presentation, 18 (58%) had complete enhancement resolution at follow-up, with a median time to resolution of 51.8 months (95% CI, 24.9–83.4 months). Patients had significantly lower pyramidal (p = 0.004) and sensory functional (p = 0.031) systems scores from presentation to the last clinic visit. Conclusions: Because spinal cord neurosarcoidosis is challenging to diagnose and no set treatment guidelines exist, clarifying patients' clinical parameters and responses to various treatments is needed to improve timely and efficient care. The incidence of spinal cord involvement in sarcoidosis in our cohort was higher than intracranial involvement and most patients had a long extensive intramedullary lesion. We also observed that most patients with spinal cord neurosarcoidosis improved clinically and radiologically after treatment; however, the resolution of MRI enhancement after immunosuppressive therapy may take years. Prospective studies of neurosarcoidosis will be crucial to address questions about effective treatment and long-term prognosis.
medicine, general & internal