Eye Gaze Reveals a Fast, Parallel Extraction of the Syntax of Arithmetic Formulas
Elisa Schneider,M. Maruyama,S. Dehaene,M. Sigman
Abstract:Mathematics shares with language an essential reliance on the human capacity for recur-sion, permitting the generation of an infinite range of embedded expressions from a finite set of symbols. We studied the role of syntax in arithmetic thinking, a neglected component of numerical cognition, by examining eye movement sequences during the calculation of arithmetic expressions. Specifically, we investigated whether, similar to language, an expression has to be scanned sequentially while the nested syntactic structure is being computed or, alternatively, whether this structure can be extracted quickly and in parallel. Our data provide evidence for the latter: fixations sequences were stereotypically organized in clusters that reflected a fast identification of syntactic embeddings. A syntactically relevant pattern of eye movement was observed even when syntax was defined by implicit procedural rules (precedence of multiplication over addition) rather than explicit parentheses. While the total number of fixations was determined by syntax, the duration of each fixation varied with the complexity of the arithmetic operation at each step. These findings provide strong evidence for a syntactic organization for arithmetic thinking, paving the way for further comparative analysis of differences and coincidences in the instantiation of recursion in language and mathematics. Human language is characterized by a generative capacity: by embedding linguistic constituents inside each other, we can generate an infinite number of sentences. This capacity does not seem to exist in other animal communication systems (Chomsky, 1957). It has been suggested to arise from a core process of recursion which allows the formation of tree-like mental structures, not only in the field of language, but also in other cognitive domains such as music and mathematics (Hauser, Chomsky, & Fitch, 2002). Recursion would be a key distinctive feature separating humans from non-human primates. While there is a vast corpus of evidence demonstrating a syntactic organization of language (Chomsky, 1988), and similar analyses of music (Lerdahl & Jackendoff, 1996; Pa-tel, 2003), only a handful of studies have explored whether and how mathematical reasoning is organized at the syntactic level. These studies focused on the perception and They demonstrated that syntactically well-formed substrings such as 4 À x can be more easily memorized than random non-grammatical strings such as x3 (Nowak et al., 2000). Providing further evidence in favor of a syntactic encoding of equations, Nowak et al. (2000) showed that within the 0010-0277/$-see front matter Ó 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.