A phase Ia/Ib study evaluating the safety and efficacy of intratumorally administrated OH2, an oncolytic herpes simplex virus 2, in unresected stage IIIC to IV melanoma patients.

Xuan Wang,Chuanliang Cui,Bin Lian,Lu Si,Zhihong Chi,Xinan Sheng,Yan Kong,Han Hu,Xiangyong Gu,Caili Li,Lili Mao,Xue Bai,Bixia Tang,Xieqiao Yan,Siming Li,Li Zhou,Binlei Liu,Jun Guo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.e21537
IF: 45.3
2022-06-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:e21537 Background: OH2 is a herpes simplex virus type 2-derived oncolytic virus. It was engineered to selectively replicate within tumors and express granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) to enhance tumor-specific immune responses. We conducted a phase Ia/Ib clinical trial to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy in unresected stage IIIC to IV melanoma patients (pts). Methods: In this phase Ia/Ib trial, we enrolled pts aged between 18-75 with histologically confirmed unresectable stage III or distant metastatic melanoma failed with prior therapies. In phase Ia, nine pts were in the single-dose group, where 3 dose levels (10 6 , 10 7 , and 10 8 CCID50/mL) of OH2 were assessed. And six pts were in the multi-dose group testing multiple administration regimens. The recommended doses were then expanded in phase Ib. The primary objective was the safety and tolerability of OH2 injection as defined by the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) in phase Ia. Antitumor activity was assessed per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST version 1.1) and immune-RECIST in phase Ib. The clinical trial information: NCT04386967. Results: 35 pts were enrolled between November, 2018 and December, 2021. Among this, 37.1% were stageIVM1b-M1c; 88.6% had received of previous treatments: In the phase Ia study, OH2 was well-tolerated, neither serious AEs (SAEs) nor death were reported. No patient experienced TEAE leading to early withdrawal. Most TRAEs were Grade 1 in severity. There were no Grade 3 or above TRAEs. No DLTs were recorded, and the most frequent TRAEs were pyrexia (80%), Skin depigmentation (26.7), Oedema peripheral (26.7%), which were similar in three different doses of the single-dose group. The one-year survival rate was 93.3 % with median overall survival (mOS) being 20.8 months (still ongoing). In the phase Ib study, five pts achieved immune-partial response/partial response. The overall response rate (ORR) was 25.0 % and the five pts had ongoing responses. Six pts experienced stable disease (SD) with a disease control rate (DCR) being 55 %. The durable response rate (partial or complete response for ≥ 6 months) was 60 %. There were seven III-IV1a pts prior treated with anti-PD-1 antibodies. Three of the seven pts achieved iPR/PR (42.9 %), with DCR being 85.7 %. Conclusions: OH2 oncolytic virotherapy showed a favorable safety profile with no DLTs. And exhibited durable antitumor activity in pts. It warrants further investigation for the treatment of pts with unresectable melanoma. Clinical trial information: NCT04386967.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?