A systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the biological sex ratio in monogenic genetic and non-genetic dilated cardiomyopathy

N Bergan,I Prachee,S Prasad,J Gregson,J Ware,U Tayal
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.2065
IF: 39.3
2024-10-30
European Heart Journal
Abstract:Background Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is characterised by left ventricular or biventricular systolic dysfunction and dilatation, in the absence of abnormal loading conditions or coronary artery disease (1). Up to 30% of cases have an identified monogenic cause, usually with autosomal dominant (AD) inheritance (2). The disease appears to be twice as common in males, suggesting either a sex specific penetrance or a potential difference in expressivity. This sex ratio has not been systematically evaluated for genetic forms of DCM. Purpose To assess the sex ratio in patients with all-cause DCM compared to genetic (monogenic) and gene-elusive subtypes, defined by the presence or absence of a pathogenic variant in DCM-associated genes. Methods A literature search was conducted to identify cohorts of DCM patients with identifiable sex ratios. Exclusion criteria were patients with syndromic, X-linked, mitochondrial, or autosomal recessive (AR) DCM. Studies with a small cohort size (n<100), a paediatric population, unidentifiable sex ratio, or ischaemic and peripartum DCM were excluded. 98 studies with a total of 36,662 participants were included in this study. A random-effects meta-analysis generated a pooled proportion of female participants with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for an overall DCM cohort as well as for the subtypes – all genetic DCM, individual gene level for 10 key DCM genes (including titin, TTN, and lamin, LMNA), and gene elusive DCM. Results The overall DCM cohort had a 0.30 female proportion (95% CI: 0.28-0.32; Figure 1). This corresponds to a male:female (M:F) ratio of 2.38:1. This ratio did not significantly change in patients with an identified causative DCM variant (0.31 [95% CI 0.26-0.36]; M:F ratio of 2.22:1; p=0.563). There was also no significant difference when compared to patients who had been genetically tested with no identified variant (0.30 [95% CI 0.24-0.37]; M:F ratio of 2.29:1; p=0.814). Furthermore, the ratio within participants with AD gene variants was not significantly different for the specific genes of TTN (0.28 [95% CI 0.22-0.36]; M:F ratio of 2.51:1) and LMNA (0.35 [95% CI 0.27-0.44]; M:F ratio of 1.84:1). Overall, the sex ratio amongst patients with these AD gene variants was similar to the all-cause group (0.34 [95% CI 0.28-0.40]; M:F ratio of 1.98:1; p=0.18); Figure 2. Conclusions This meta-analysis suggests that DCM is twice as prevalent in males than females, even in pooled monogenic genetic subtypes with an equally prevalent genetic risk factor, indicating a difference in penetrance between the sexes. Further studies are required to determine the drivers of this sex specific penetrance.Forest plots: overall DCM cohortForest plots: gene-specific DCM cohort
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?