Abstract:Past research has shown that people are inconsistent when making predictions about emotions and moral behaviors following their own wrongdoing. However, it is less clear how people react when they did not cause the wrongdoing themselves but the group or collective they associate with. The present paper investigates people's reactions to collective wrongdoing and the question (1) whether the prediction of the experience of group‐based guilt is related to actual moral behaviors and (2) whether this prediction is reliable. In three studies, we analyze collective guilt and subsequent behavioral reactions. Study 1 involved real academic situations, varying the kind of unfair treatment of others. A priori, participants overestimated their own subsequent experiences of collective guilt as well as their moral behavior. With respect to actual responses, experienced guilt was the strongest predictor of behavioral reactions, while imagined guilt, in‐group identification and satisfaction did not significantly predict responses. Moreover, participants also reacted more to the direct harm caused by their group to others than to unjustified privileges granted to others. Study 2 fully replicated these results and showed relative stability in the predictions of collective guilt. Study 3 compared the responses by participants of the previous two studies with their responses 5 years later, indicating high stability of the observed effects over time. Also, we observed that making repeated predictions after experiencing the guilt‐eliciting situation did not improve the accuracy of our participants' predictions. We discuss the implications of these findings for self‐predictions, behavioral and affective forecasting of collective emotions, and for common assessment methods of guilt by hypothetical vignettes.

Retributive reactions to suspected offenders: the importance of social categorizations and guilt probability

Predicting Emotional and Behavioral Reactions to Collective Wrongdoing: Effects of Imagined Versus Experienced Collective Guilt on Moral Behavior

The effect of confirmation bias and racial stereotypes on perceptions of guilt and interrogation strategy decisions

Neurocognitive mechanisms of reactions to second- and third-party justice violations

Accuracy, Bias, and Overgeneralization: Perceived Aggression Guides Threat Detection and Punishment of Female Criminal Offenders

Intuitive anger in the context of crime and punishment

How retributive motives shape the emergence of third‐party punishment across intergroup contexts

An Attributional Analysis of Punishment Goals and Public Reactions to O. J. Simpson

The Relationship Between Belief in a Just World and Antisocial Behavior Through Anticipated Guilt, Victim Deservedness, and Punishment Frame

The effect of wrongdoer's status on observer punishment recommendations: the mediating role of envy and the moderating role of belief in a just world

After Exoneration: Attributions of Responsibility Impact Perceptions

Arousal, Processing, and Risk Taking: Consequences of Intergroup Anger

Guilt, Shame and Academic Misconduct

The Intuition of Punishment: A Study of Fairness Preferences and Cognitive Ability

Reaping What They Sow? Victim-Offender Overlap Perceptions and Victim Blaming Attitudes

The impact of group membership on punishment versus partner rejection

Investigating predictors of true and false guilty pleas.

Third-party punishment following observed social rejection.

Race, Culpability, and Defendant Plea-Bargaining Decisions: An Experimental Simulation

Unraveling Image and Justice Concerns: A Social Identity Account on Appraisals and Emotional Drivers of High-Status Transgressor Group Members' Solidarity With Low-Status Groups

Do individual characteristics explain variation in sanction risk updating among serious juvenile offenders? Advancing the logic of differential deterrence.