Abstract:Our memories of other people shape how we interact with them. Yet, even when we forget exactly what others said or did, we often remember impressions that capture a general gist of their behavior-whether they were forthright, friendly, or funny. Drawing on fuzzy trace theory, we propose two modes of social impression formation: impressions formed based on ordinal gist ("more competent," "less competent") or categorical gist ("competent," "incompetent"). In turn, we propose that people gravitate toward the simplest representation available and that different modes of memory have distinct consequences for social decisions. Specifically, ordinal impressions lead people to make decisions based on an individual's standing relative to others, whereas categorical impressions lead people to make decisions based on discrete classifications that interpret behavior. In four experiments, participants learned about two groups of individuals who differed in their competence (Studies 1a, 2, and 3) or generosity (Study 1b). When participants encoded impressions as ordinal rankings, they preferred to hire or help a relatively good target from a low-performing group over a relatively bad target from a high-performing group, even though both targets behaved identically and accuracy was incentivized. However, when participants could use categorical boundaries to interpret behavior, this preference was eliminated. In a final experiment, changing the category participants used to encode others' generosity changed their impressions, even when accounting for memory for verbatim details. This work links social impressions to theories of mental representation in memory and judgment, highlighting how distinct representations support divergent patterns of social decision-making. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

When questions change behavior: the role of ease of representation

Action and Motivation: Measuring Perception or Strategies?

When Consumers Do Not Recognize “Benign” Intention Questions as Persuasion Attempts

Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence.

The generalization of deliberative and automatic behavior: The role of procedural knowledge and affective reactions

Perceived Naturalness Biases Objective Behavior in Both Trivial and Meaningful Contexts

Beyond Observation: Manipulating Circumstances to Detect Affordances and Infer Traits

Two modes of social impressions and their effects on choice.

How to Change Behavior

Motivated response styles: The role of cultural values, regulatory focus, and self-consciousness in socially desirable responding.

Whoever you want me to be: Personality and incentives

Impression Management in Survey Responding: Easier for Collectivists or Individualists?

The construct-behavior gap in behavioral decision research: A challenge beyond replicability

Disentangling behavioral intention and behavioral expectation

Automaticity of social behavior: direct effects of trait construct and stereotype-activation on action.

Affordances in social judgment: Experimental proof of why it is a mistake to ignore how others behave towards a target and look solely at how the target behaves

Behaviour versus performance: The veiled commitment of experimental psychology

License to Sin: The Liberating Role of Reporting Expectations

Heart versus reason in condom use: implicit versus explicit attitudinal predictors of sexual behavior.

“Rarely safe to assume”: Evaluating the use and interpretation of manipulation checks in experimental social psychology

The Effect Of Overconfidence On Persistent Behavior: The Mediation Effect Of "I Think I Can Do It" Rather Than "I'M Attracted To It"