Abstract:Background: Nesmith identified two roles for the physical settings in which health care is provided. One is as a tool to support productivity and effectiveness and the second is as healer: "… they are an end in themselves - aiding in the healing and wellness process through psychological and physiological effect…" (p. 671). Research to confirm this statement has been slowly accumulating over the last two decades, but primarily in the area of adult care. Although there are a plethora of articles describing the various creative and innovative approaches to physical design in paediatric hospitals, very few of these innovations have been evaluated in terms of their impact on the health outcomes of children and their families. Objectives: The objective of this review was to determine from the available evidence the impact of the physical paediatric hospital environment on health outcomes of children and adolescents. Search strategy: Using a defined search and retrieval method, a wide range of indexes of periodical articles were accessed for the period 1980 to 2008 including both health and architectural databases. Unpublished studies from 1991 were sought using a variety of sources including Dissertation Abstracts, Index to Theses, conference proceedings, research and clinical trials registers and web sites of relevant professional associations. Inclusion criteria: The review considered studies using either quantitative or qualitative methodologies or mixed methods that assessed the impact of physical design elements of a paediatric hospital environment including architectural, interior design, ambient features and /or features that supported patient and family centred care. The primary outcomes of interest were clinical or psychological, with other outcomes of interest being patient - family perceptions, including safety and security. Methodological quality: Each study was assessed independently by two reviewers prior to inclusion in the review using standardised critical appraisal instruments developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. As both assessors were in agreement on all studies a third reviewer was not required. Data extraction and synthesis: Data was extracted independently from each of the included studies by two reviewers using standardised critical appraisal instruments developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Again there were no disagreements between the reviewers in relation to the data extracted from the quantitative studies. Agreement was reached on the synthesis of the findings from the two qualitative studies through discussion. Given the differences in study design, interventions and outcome measures in the quantitative studies, statistical pooling of the results was not possible and the findings are presented in a narrative form. Results: Eight studies were included in the review with five elements of physical design addressed. In the sub-topic of physical building structures, single room design for paediatric intensive care units significantly reduced nosocomial infections as did the addition of negative pressure ventilation to single rooms in an isolation unit. The one study on the effect of specially designed gardens found very low usage rates but children who did visit them were actively engaged with both natural and structural features. On the same theme of active engagement a play centre designed to encourage symbolic play generated statistically significantly more total play and less unoccupied time or wandering as well as the type of play it was designed to encourage. The one study on art did not demonstrate that nature art was effective in reducing stress in hospitalised children. In regard to adolescents, the two themes that emerged in regard to physical facilities from the two qualitative studies were ways of maximising normal life and ways of supporting coping with the illness through ward design. Conclusion: Given the small number of studies addressing five sub-topics, no firm conclusions can be drawn from the review. However the results suggest positive elements of physical design that could be considered for implementation to support a healing environment within paediatric hospitals or paediatric wards in general hospitals. Implications for research: The review clearly illustrates the need for more research in this area assessing the health outcomes of innovations in physical design in paediatric hospitals or units. There are numerous opportunities for multidisciplinary studies and in varying cultural contexts. Implications for practice: This review suggests a number of aspects of physical design that can be implemented although cost and cultural appropriateness are a consideration in several cases. These include the use of single rooms with negative pressure ventilation to control cross infection; the provision of both private and 'public' space for adolescent inpatients with 'public' spaces including spaces for interaction just with other peers; the incorporation of interactive gardens, however small, designed for families and their use encouraged by staff; and specially designed play structures to encourage symbolic play.

Commentary: Can a modernised psychiatric unit space reduce the use of coercive measures in child and adolescent psychiatry? A commentary on Czernine et al. (2024)

Rates and risk factors of coercive measure use in inpatient child and adolescent mental health services: a systematic review and narrative synthesis

'We tried our best... it wasn't great': a qualitative study of clinician experiences on child psychiatry wards at the height of COVID-19

Uncovering Complexities in Reducing Aggression, Conflict and Restrictive Practices in Acute Mental Healthcare Settings: An Overview of Reviews

Current evidence and opportunities in child and adolescent public mental health: a research review

Psychosocial workplace safety in mental health services – Commentary and considerations to improve safety

Evaluating outcomes following adolescent and youth mental health inpatient admissions: A systematic review

Managing Challenging Behaviour in the Adolescent Inpatient Environment

Children and adolescents at risk for seclusion and restraint in inpatient psychiatric treatment: a case control study

Optimising child and adolescent mental health care – a scoping review of international best-practice strategies and service models

The impact of psychiatric facility design on reducing aggressive behaviours in an adult population: a narrative literature review

Impact of the physical environment in paediatric hospitals on health outcomes: a systematic review

Therapeutic relationships within child and adolescent mental health inpatient services: A qualitative exploration of the experiences of young people, family members and nursing staff

Can we improve the morale of staff working in psychiatric units? A systematic review

A novel model of care for paediatric patients with developmental disabilities and associated behaviours of concern

Alternatives to mental health admissions for children and adolescents experiencing mental health crises: A systematic review of the literature

Admissions to paediatric medical wards with a primary mental health diagnosis: a systematic review of the literature

Components of interventions to reduce restrictive practices with children and young people in institutional settings: the Contrast systematic mapping review

De-escalating aggression in acute inpatient mental health settings: a behaviour change theory-informed, secondary qualitative analysis of staff and patient perspectives

"If you're struggling, you don't really care" - what affects the physical health of young people on child and adolescent mental health inpatient units? A qualitative study with service users and staff

Response to: 'Impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of children and young people: perspectives on evidence synthesis' by Hossain et al