Abstract:Abstract This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to compare the accuracy of component positioning, alignment and balancing techniques employed, patient-reported outcomes, and complications of robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty (RATKA) with manual TKA (mTKA) and the associated learning curve. Searches of PubMed, Medline and Google Scholar were performed in October 2020 using PRISMA guidelines. Search terms included “robotic”, “knee” and “arthroplasty”. The criteria for inclusion were published clinical research articles reporting the learning curve for RATKA and those comparing the component position accuracy, alignment and balancing techniques, functional outcomes, or complications with mTKA. There were 198 articles identified, following full text screening, 16 studies satisfied the inclusion criteria and reported the learning curve of rTKA ( n =5), component positioning accuracy ( n =6), alignment and balancing techniques ( n =7), functional outcomes ( n =7), or complications ( n =5). Two studies reported the learning curve using CUSUM analysis to establish an inflexion point for proficiency which ranged from 7 to 11 cases and there was no learning curve for component positioning accuracy. The meta-analysis showed a significantly lower difference between planned component position and implanted component position, and the spread was narrower for RATKA compared with the mTKA group (Femur coronal: mean 1.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08–1.55, p <0.00001; Tibia coronal: mean 1.56, 95% CI 1.32–1.81, p <0.00001). Three studies reported using different alignment and balancing techniques between mTKA and RATKA, two studies used the same for both group and two studies did not state the methods used in their RATKA groups. RATKA resulted in better Knee Society Score compared to mTKA in the short-to-mid-term follow up (95%CI [− 1.23, − 0.51], p =0.004). There was no difference in arthrofibrosis, superficial and deep infection, wound dehiscence, or overall complication rates. RATKA demonstrated improved accuracy of component positioning and patient-reported outcomes. The learning curve of RATKA for operating time was between 7 and 11 cases. Future well-powered studies on RATKAs should report on the knee alignment and balancing techniques utilised to enable better comparisons on which techniques maximise patient outcomes. Level of evidence III.

A novel robotic surgical assistant for total knee arthroplasty has a learning curve ranging from 6 to 14 cases and exhibits high accuracy in tibial bone cuts

Introduction of ROSA robotic-arm system for total knee arthroplasty is associated with a minimal learning curve for operative time

Analysis of the Initial Learning Curve for Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the ROSA® Knee System

The learning curve to ROSA: cases needed to match the surgery time between a robotic-assisted and a manual primary total knee arthroplasty

Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with a learning curve for surgical time but not for component alignment, limb alignment and gap balancing

High in‐vivo accuracy of a novel robotic‐arm‐assisted system for total knee arthroplasty

Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty has a learning curve of seven cases for integration into the surgical workflow but no learning curve effect for accuracy of implant positioning

Accuracy and Outcomes of a Novel Cut-Block Positioning Robotic-Arm Assisted System for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Imageless robotic handpiece-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a learning curve analysis of surgical time and alignment accuracy

How long does image based robotic total knee arthroplasty take during the learning phase? Analysis of the key steps from the first fifty cases

Accuracy of a New Robotically Assisted Technique for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Cadaveric Study

The ROSA robotic-arm system reliably restores joint line height, patella height and posterior condylar offset in total knee arthroplasty

Learning curve and short-term clinical outcomes of a new seven-axis robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty system: a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study

Initial Experience with the NAVIO Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Replacement—Coronal Alignment Accuracy and the Learning Curve

Accuracy of total knee arthroplasty assisted by a kind of homemade robot: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Comparison of Alignment Accuracy and Clinical Outcomes between a CT‐Based, Saw Cutting Robotic System and a CT‐Free, Jig‐guided Robotic System for Total Knee Arthroplasty

Robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty system has a learning curve of 11 cases and increased operating time

Simultaneous Evaluation of Bone Cut and Implant Placement Accuracy in Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved accuracy and patient reported outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Complications and Learning Curve Associated with an Imageless Burr-Based (CORI) Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty System: Results from First 500 Cases

Evaluating the accuracy of a new robotically assisted system in cadaveric total knee arthroplasty procedures