Design and Evaluation of a Curriculum on Intimate Partner Violence for Medical Students in an Emergency Medicine Clerkship
Alanna Darling,Edward Ullman,Victor Novak,Melissa Doyle,Nicole M Dubosh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S365450
2022-10-14
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Abstract:Alanna Darling, 1 Edward Ullman, 2 Victor Novak, 3 Melissa Doyle, 4 Nicole M Dubosh 2 1 Department of Emergency Medicine, UMass Chan Medical School – Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA, USA; 2 Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; 3 Soroka University Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel; 4 Center for Violence Prevention and Recovery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA Correspondence: Alanna Darling, UMass Chan Medical School - Baystate Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, 759 Chestnut St., Springfield 5, S5426, Springfield, MA, 01199, USA, Tel +1 508-414-4492, Email ; Purpose: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a widespread public health issue that is relevant to all areas of medicine. Patients who suffer from IPV often contact the health care system via the emergency department, making this a particularly important but too often overlooked issue in this setting. Education on IPV varies in medical schools and emergency medicine (EM) educational programs, and evidence suggests that a barrier to assessing for IPV is a lack of adequate training of clinicians. In this study, we sought to design, implement and evaluate the efficacy of a curriculum on IPV geared towards medical students on an EM clerkship. Methods: We assembled a multi-disciplinary team of EM education faculty, a resident content expert on IPV, and social workers to design a two-part curriculum that was administered to medical students on an EM clerkship. The curriculum involved a 20-minute narrated slide presentation viewed asynchronously, followed by a 1-hour case-based discussion session. The curriculum was evaluated using a 13-item self-assessment survey on knowledge, comfort level and skill in managing victims of IPV, administered electronically before and after the curriculum. Survey results were compared pre- and post-curriculum using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: Thirty-four students completed the curriculum and 26 completed both the pre and post self-assessment surveys. A statistically significant improvement in knowledge, comfort level and skills was observed in 11 of the 13 survey elements. Conclusion: Based on the self-assessment survey results, this curriculum was well received and successfully increased participants' comfort, knowledge and skill level regarding assessment of patients for IPV. This is a focused and feasible curriculum that can be easily incorporated into an EM clerkship to provide effective education on a relevant but often overlooked topic. Keywords: interpersonal violence, domestic violence, undergraduate medical education, intimate partner violence Intimate partner violence (IPV), as defined by the Centers for Disease Control, includes physical violence, sexual violence, stalking and psychological aggression by a current or former intimate partner (ie, spouse, boyfriend/girlfriend, dating partner, or ongoing sexual partner). According to the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence survey published in 2010, an estimated 35.6% of women and 28.5% of men have experienced rape, physical violence, and/or stalking by an intimate partner in their lifetime. 1 An updated Data Brief published in 2015 indicated that about 18.3% of women experienced contact sexual violence, 30.6% experienced physical violence, 10.4% experienced stalking, and 36.4% experienced psychological aggression by an intimate partner in their lifetime. 2 Globally, a 2022 study estimated that 27% of ever-partnered women age 15–49 had experienced IPV in their lifetime. 3 IPV is associated with a range of adverse health outcomes, including acute traumatic injuries, infections, mental health consequences, and chronic pain syndromes. 4–12 Contact with the healthcare system, and in particular the emergency department (ED), is common in those experiencing IPV. 13–15 Healthcare providers can therefore be one important element in a broader, systems-based approach to this public health issue. 16 Health professionals who receive specific education and training are more likely to assess for IPV, 17,18 and physicians and nurses often cite a lack of knowledge or lack of confidence as major obstacles to evaluating patients for IPV. 19–21 Training and education regarding IPV is not yet universal in undergraduate medical education or specialty-specific training in emergency medicine (EM). There is also evidence that medical students tend to feel IPV is less relevant to their practice as they advance in their studies. 22 However, survey studies of IPV vi -Abstract Truncated-