Abstract:We describe several experiments on contour interactions and crowding effects at the resolution limit of the visual system. As test stimuli we used characters that are often employed in optometric practice for testing visual acuity: Landolt C's, Snellen E's, and rectangular gratings. We tested several hypotheses that have been put forward to explain contour interaction and crowding effects. In Experiment 1 and Experiment 2, Landolt C's were the test stimuli, and bars, or Landolt C's, or gratings served as distractors. In Experiment 1, we showed that neither scale invariance nor spatial frequency selectivity is a characteristic of foveal crowding effects. These results allowed us to conclude that mechanisms other than lateral masking contribute to observers' performance in 'crowded' tasks. R. F. Hess, S. C. Dakin, and N. Kappor (2000) suggested that the spatial frequency band most appropriate for target recognition is shifted by the surrounding bars to higher spatial frequencies that cannot be resolved by observers. Our Experiment 2 rejects this hypothesis as the experimental data do not follow theoretical predictions. In Experiment 3, we employed Snellen E's, both as test stimuli and as distractors. The masking functions were similar to those measured in Experiment 1 when the test Landolt C was surrounded by Landolt C's. In Experiment 4, we extended the range of test stimuli to rectangular gratings; same-frequency or high-frequency gratings were distractors. In this case, if the distracting gratings had random orientation from trial to trial, the critical spacing was twice larger than in the first three experiments. If the orientation of the distractors was fixed during the whole experiment, the critical spacing was similar to that measured in the first three experiments. We suggest that the visual system can use different mechanisms for the discrimination of different test stimuli in the presence of particular surround. Different receptive fields with different spatial characteristics can be employed. To explain why crowding effects at the resolution limit of the visual system are not scale invariant, we suggest that a range of stimuli, slightly varying in size, may all be processed by the same neural channel--the channel with the smallest receptive fields of the visual system.

[Visual mechanisms of recognition of vanishing figures]

Foveal contour interactions and crowding effects at the resolution limit of the visual system

Foveal contour interaction: detection and discrimination

Foveal crowding for large and small Landolt Cs: Similarity and Attention

Visual search of illusory contours: The role of illusory contour clarity

Classifying Illusory Contours: Edges Defined by "pacman" and Monocular Tokens.

Identification and detection of simple 3D objects with severely blurred vision

Detecting and Remembering Pictures with and Without Visual Noise

Global Contour Processing in Amblyopia

Human efficiency for recognizing 3-D objects in luminance noise

Higher contrast thresholds for vanishing optotype recognition in macular visual fields among glaucoma patients: a structure-function analysis

Human efficiency for recognizing and detecting low-pass filtered objects

The FreiBurger: a new optotype for P300-based acuity estimation

Psychophysical Evidence for Competition Between Real and Illusory Contour Processing

Using Geometric Moments To Explain Human Letter Recognition Near The Acuity Limit

Correcting visual acuity beyond 20/20 improves contour element detection and integration: A cautionary tale for studies of special populations

The adaptation to Kanizsa-type illusory contours

A Comparison of Foveal and Peripheral Contour Interaction and Crowding

Visual short-term memory for crossed and uncrossed binocular disparities

V1 mechanisms and some figure–ground and border effects

Influence of visual acuity on monocular face perception and exploration: Evidence from gaze‐contingency