Effects of COVID-19-targeted non-pharmaceutical interventions on pediatric emergency department use: a quasi-experimental study interrupted time-series analysis in North Italian hospitals, 2017 to 2022
Matteo Puntoni,Giuseppe Maglietta,Caterina Caminiti,Angela Miniaci,Marcello Lanari,Fabio Caramelli,Federico Marchetti,Alessandro De Fanti,Lorenzo Iughetti,Giacomo Biasucci,Agnese Suppiej,Andrea Miceli,Chiara Ghizzi,Gianluca Vergine,Melodie Aricò,Marcello Stella,Susanna Esposito,Emilia-Romagna Paediatric COVID-19 network,Francesca Diodati,Chiara Maria Palo,Luca Bertelli,Giovanni Biserni,Angela Troisi,Alessandra Iacono,Federico Bonvicini,Domenico Bartolomeo,Andrea Trombetta,Tommaso Zini,Nicoletta de Paulis,Cristina Forest,Battista Guidi,Francesca Di Florio,Enrico Valletta,Francesco Accomando,Greta Ramundo,Alberto Argentiero,Valentina Fainardi,Michela Deolmi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1439078
2024-07-31
Abstract:Background: The use of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) during the COVID-19 pandemic is debated. Understanding the consequences these measures may have on vulnerable populations including children and adolescents is important. Methods: This is a multicenter, quasi-experimental before-after study involving 12 hospitals of the North Italian Emilia-Romagna Region, with NPI implementation as the intervention event. The 3 years preceding NPI implementation (in March 2020) constituted the pre-pandemic phase. The subsequent 2 years were further subdivided into a school closure phase (SC) and a subsequent mitigation measures phase (MM) with milder restrictions. Interrupted Time Series (ITS) regression analysis was used to calculate PED Standardized Incidence Rate Ratios (SIRR) on the diagnostic categories exhibiting the greatest frequency and/or variation. Results: In the 60 months of the study there were 765,215 PED visits. Compared to the pre-pandemic rate, overall PED presentations dropped by 58 and 39% during SC and MM, respectively. "Symptoms, signs and Ill-defined conditions," "Injury and poisoning" and "Diseases of the Respiratory System" accounted for 74% of the reduction. A different pattern was instead seen for "Mental Disorders," which exhibited the smallest decrease during SC, and is the only category which rose already at the end of SC. ITS analysis confirmed the strong decrease during SC (level change, IRR 0.17, 95%CI 0.12-0.27) and a significant increase in MM (slope change, IRR 1.23, 95%CI 1.13-1.33), with the sharpest decline (-94%) and rise (+36%) observed in the "Diseases of the Respiratory System" category. Mental Disorders showed a significant increasing trend of 1% monthly over the whole study period exceeding pre-pandemic levels at the end of MM. Females and adolescents showed higher increasing rates both in SC and MM. Conclusion: NPIs appear to have influenced PED attendance in different ways according to diagnostic categories, mirroring different mechanisms of action. These effects are beneficial in some cases and harmful in others, and establishing a clear balance between pros and cons is a difficult task for public health decision makers. The role of NPIs on PED use appropriateness deserves investigation. The rise in pediatric mental disorders independent of the pandemic makes interventions addressing these issues urgent.