Abstract:Aim(s) To discuss the methodological aspects of participatory design, arguing for a three‐phase approach and the suitability of situating participatory design within a phenomenological–hermeneutical tradition in health science. Design and methods Methodological discussion based on participatory design theory, epistemology and research studies. Results The epistemological and methodological discussions show how the core values and key elements of participatory design align with the phenomenological–hermeneutical approach. In addition, examples of participatory design studies are provided to illustrate how it can be conducted in health science. Conclusion Participatory design is a flexible framework based on genuine participation, defined by three core values: having a say, mutual learning and democratization. The iterative processes allow for adjustments in alignment with the core values and the scientific stance that defines the choice of methods, tools and techniques. A phenomenological–hermeneutic approach in participatory design studies is relevant and aligned with the core values of participatory design. Thus, this paper argues for a close integration between the participatory design methodology and the phenomenological–hermeneutic scientific approach within health science. Implications for the profession Participatory design is a powerful methodology with core values that can co‐design sustainable health technologies with potential to impact patient care and the clinical practice of nurses. When combined with qualitative research methods, patients' lived experiences serve as the foundation for improving clinical nursing practice. Discussing the epistemological aspects of participatory design provides nurse researchers with a coherent methodological understanding, essential for the continual development of nursing research. Impact This paper discusses the research methodology of participatory design within health sciences. It aims to address the lack of understanding of the methodology, particularly within a specific scientific stance. The main finding is the elaboration on participatory design and the relevance of a phenomenological–hermeneutical approach. The paper has the potential to impact researchers, master's and PhD students, as well as others engaged in participatory design or other methodologies related to user involvement within health science. Reporting method No available EQUATOR guidelines were applicable to this methodological paper, as no new data were created or analysed. Patient or public contribution There was no direct patient or public contribution, as this is a methodological paper.

Adding It Up: The Costs and Benefits of Investing In Family Planning and Maternal and Newborn Health

Constructivist Grounded Theory or Interpretive Phenomenology? Methodological Choices Within Specific Study Contexts

Post-structural feminist interpretive interactionism

Reiter’s syndrome following intravesical bacille biliÉ de Calmette–GuÉrin treatment for superficial bladder carcinoma: report of six cases

Playing well with others: lessons from theatre for the health professions about collaboration, creativity and community

Cloning, expression and characterization of a putative 7alpha-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase in Comamonas testosteroni.

Pragmatic patchwork ethnography, a call to action for health, nutrition and dietetic researchers

Epistemological aspects of participatory design studies conducted in the field of health science

Initial experience with ovarian vein embolization for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain syndrome.

Silicon-based on-chip electrically tunable phase-shifted waveguide Bragg grating for integrated microwave photonic applications

Getting the methods right: Challenges and appropriateness of mixed methods research in health-related doctoral studies

Interweaving Arts-Based, Qualitative and Mixed Methods Research: Showcasing Integration and Knowledge Translation Through Material and Narrative Reflection

Choose Your Method: A Comparison of Phenomenology, Discourse Analysis, and Grounded Theory

Clinician experience of being interprofessional: an interpretive phenomenological analysis

Verbatim theatre as a creative approach to health professions education research translation

Discourse research that intervenes in the quality and safety of care practices

Methodological issues surrounding the use of vignettes in qualitative research

Industrial Conceptualization of Health Care Versus the Naturalistic Decision-Making Paradigm: Work as Imagined Versus Work as Done

The Integrated Care World is a Stage: Applying Goffman's Theory of Dramaturgy to the Activities of Integrated Care

Intrinsic motivation, curiosity, and learning: Theory and applications in educational technologies.

The power struggle: exploring the reality of clinical reasoning